Connect with us

Everton

Šeško’s counter finishes Everton as Man Utd claim 1-0 win

Benjamin Šeško’s 71st-minute goal off the bench sealed Man Utd’s 1-0 win over Everton. extended run.

Published

on

Manchester United returned to Premier League duty after nearly two weeks and recorded a 1-0 victory over Everton on Monday evening. The result ended the immediate reaction to the West Ham defeat and moved United to within three points of third-place Aston Villa. It also extended the Red Devils’ unbeaten run under Carrick to six Premier League matches.

The game was settled by a substitute. Benjamin Šeško replaced Amad Diallo in the 58th minute and, by the 71st, completed a swift counter with the match’s only goal. Matheus Cunha supplied a long, precision pass from deep to release a sprinting Bryan Mbeumo; Šeško then ran the length of the pitch and finished with composure to seal all three points.

Until that moment United’s attack had laboured. Everton’s defence kept Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo largely quiet for more than an hour, Amad lacked cutting quality in the final third, and Bruno Fernandes was forced to drop deep to find the ball.

The victory carried extra weight after the clubs met earlier in the season when United suffered a 1-0 loss to an undermanned Everton.

Advertisement

Player ratings

GK: Senne Lammens—8.4: Had hardly anything to do until Everton applied the pressure in the dying stages. Stood tall and held firm, making key saves in stoppage time.

RB: Diogo Dalot—7.9: Tried to be a bit too clever at times, but an overall solid outing.

CB: Leny Yoro—7.2: Settled in nicely after a nervy start.

Advertisement

CB: Harry Maguire—7.7: Uneventful but effective.

LB: Luke Shaw—6.9: Handled a tough matchup with Iliman Ndiaye, struggled to link up with Cunha.

DM: Casemiro—7.8: Uncharacteristically poor on the ball with giveaways and errant passes.

DM: Kobbie Mainoo—6.9: Tidy in possession but not decisive in key sequences.

Advertisement

RW: Amad Diallo—6.9: Tracked back well but lacked end product.

AM: Bruno Fernandes—6.7: Forced to drop deep and did not create a chance.

LW: Matheus Cunha—6.9: Worked hard and produced the pass that created the goal.

ST: Bryan Mbeumo—7.4: Quiet for long periods but vital in the decisive move.

Advertisement

SUB: Benjamin Šeško (58’ for Amad)—7.3: Scored the winner and nearly had a second in stoppage time.

SUB: Noussair Mazraoui (68’ for Mbeumo)—6.0: Came on to shore up the defence.

SUB: Ayden Heaven (95’ for Cunha)—N/A

Unused subs: Altay Bayındır (GK), Tyrell Malacia, Jack Moorhouse, Manuel Ugarte, Tyler Fletcher, Joshua Zirkzee.

Advertisement

Match statistics

Possession: Everton 48% — Man Utd 52%

Expected Goals (xG): Everton 0.62 — Man Utd 1.27

Total Shots: Everton 12 — Man Utd 11

Advertisement

Shots on Target: Everton 4 — Man Utd 3

Big Chances: Everton 0 — Man Utd 2

Passing Accuracy: Everton 77% — Man Utd 80%

Fouls Committed: Everton 12 — Man Utd 7

Advertisement

Corners: (as provided)

Arsenal

Eight Premier League Grounds That Define Matchday Atmosphere

Eight Premier League stadiums examined: Elland Road, Stamford Bridge, Stadium of Light and more. Fan

Published

on

The Premier League offers a wide variety of stadium experiences. Each venue in this selection delivers a distinct blend of history, design and fan culture.

Elland Road (capacity: 37,890) still feels like a fortress. Its traditional, non-bowl design keeps stands tight to the pitch and produces an intense, in-your-face atmosphere. Leeds United have played there since the club’s formation in 1919. The concourses may feel a little outdated, but that only adds to the ground’s character and makes it an intimidating place to visit.

Stamford Bridge (capacity: 41,631) is modest in scale for Chelsea, a club described in the source as two-time European champions and five-time Premier League winners. The stadium’s steep, enclosed stands trap sound and, when it is rocking, create a cauldron of noise. The stadium can feel claustrophobic, and the rhythmic clatter of fans banging metal in the stands after a goal contributes to its raw edge.

The Stadium of Light (capacity: 48,707) is a relatively modern ground, Sunderland’s home since 1997. It balances spaciousness with intimacy: wide concourses, tidy seating and excellent sightlines make for a smooth matchday. A lively fan zone and potential for future expansion underline its long-term credentials.

Advertisement

Craven Cottage (capacity: 29,589) is smaller but exceptionally charming. Perched on the banks of the Thames and surrounded by pubs and bars, it features the 1905 red-brick pavilion alongside modern upgrades and a new stand, blending tradition and contemporary comfort.

Villa Park (capacity: 42,918) often feels larger than its capacity suggests. The Holt End, with its depth and proximity to the pitch, and steep stands create constant intensity. Strong views and an old-school feel contribute to a consistently good matchday.

Old Trafford (capacity: 74,879) shows its age: leaking roof, worn structure and a confusing internal layout. Yet the stadium retains an intangible aura rooted in decades of history and memorable moments.

Everton’s new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock (capacity: 52,769) opened as a modern waterfront venue after Everton fans said goodbye to Goodison Park at the end of the 2024–25 season. It offers a wide range of social spaces, self-service “eBars,” premium dining, and some areas with cinema-style chairs and private screens.

Advertisement

St. James’ Park (capacity: 52,258) is a towering stadium whose steep stands produce an intense, close-to-action feel. High home sections and a dominant presence on the skyline combine to create a dramatic matchday setting.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Everton Weighs Legal Action over Premier League Ruling on Chelsea

Everton considers legal action after Premier League’s punishment of Chelsea drew anger and dismay. .

Published

on

Everton are reportedly preparing to challenge the Premier League after Chelsea received a reduced punishment for breaches of the division’s financial rules. Chelsea were handed a suspended one-year ban on the purchase of senior players and a nine-month academy transfer ban for unrelated matters. Both the fine and the suspended ban were smaller than the league’s usual sanctions.

Everton, who were docked eight points during the 2023–24 Premier League season for two separate profit and sustainability breaches, have reacted with “anger and dismay.” The Guardian claim that Everton are planning to write to Richard Masters asking for a clearer explanation of the reasoning and that a “legal challenge” is under consideration. Nottingham Forest, who were docked four points in the same season, are also thought to be in contact with Everton about the situation.

Chelsea were found to have made illicit payments exclusively under Roman Abramovich’s ownership. Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital discovered those irregularities while conducting due diligence ahead of their 2022 purchase and deliberately set aside around $200 million to meet any potential penalties. The size of that provision suggests the club expected a heavier sanction than the one imposed. A separate investigation by the Football Association remains ongoing.

Although Chelsea would not be the direct defendant in any case, the club could still face consequences if the Premier League is judged to have applied its rules inconsistently. Everton manager David Moyes spoke for the club when he criticised the explanation offered so far. “I don’t think they have explained it well enough in the reasoning what the fine was and why it was,” he said. “I think they have to explain exactly what has happened here. If they don’t then we are never going to understand their reasoning why.

Advertisement

“This is me not being anything against Chelsea, absolutely not, I’m just saying that everybody would like to know; Everton supporters, for the pain they had to go through when they had a huge points deduction, and other clubs as well.

“Those points deductions may well have been correct, I don’t know, but we need to see what is the difference? What would you rather have, a £10 million fine or a 10-point deduction? The money you get for your league place now, that might cover it. It would be good if we could get more of an explanation. How much is the £10 million fine having an effect, really?”

The Premier League issued limited published reasoning and cited two core reasons for deciding a sporting sanction was not appropriate.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arsenal

From £75-a-week to millions: Rooney’s scholar pay compared with Max Dowman

Rooney earned the equivalent of $100 weekly as a scholar; Max Dowman can earn $465.60 now per rules.

Published

on

Wayne Rooney’s early earnings as a scholar remain a striking reminder of how quickly a football career can change financially. Rooney has revealed he was receiving the equivalent of just $100 each week when he scored the famous goal against Arsenal in 2002. That payment came while he was still a scholar, four days shy of his 17th birthday.

The landscape for under-17 players is defined by rules that keep them on scholar terms until they are eligible to sign professional contracts. The recent emergence of Max Dowman, who scored for Arsenal against Everton 73 days after his 16th birthday, has brought those scholar payments back into focus. Dowman can earn up to $465.60 per week under current terms, an annual figure of $24,211.

Rooney recalled the difference between those scholar payments and professional wages on his BBC podcast. “When I scored against Arsenal, I think I was on £75 ($100)-a-week,” he said. “But then that was four days before my 17th birthday, so I was still a scholar [for the Arsenal game]. I used to borrow money off my mum and dad until I signed my pro contract.” The transition at 17 is decisive: a contemporary newspaper report noted that, upon signing his first professional contract, Rooney jumped to a weekly salary of $17,293 (at today’s rate), an amount that worked out at almost $900,000 a year.

The progression continued rapidly. By the time Rooney left Everton and joined Manchester United aged 18, he was being paid not far short of $3.5 million per season. Those figures underline the contrast between scholar allowances and professional terms, and they also reflect Rooney’s own modest upbringing. He admitted he used to exaggerate travel distances when reporting for England’s national youth teams. “I used to find the furthest place away and say that’s where we drove in from,” he laughed.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending