Chelsea
Maresca’s Public Frustration Puts Chelsea’s Structure Under Scrutiny
Maresca criticised unnamed figures after the Everton win and faces a summer review of his role later
Enzo Maresca’s unprompted comments after Chelsea’s win over Everton have focused attention on the club’s internal arrangements and the relationship between the manager and those above him. What began as a routine press conference turned into a public airing of frustration that club officials now describe as an “emotional reaction.”
On the back of the Everton victory Maresca said, “Since I joined the club, the last 48 hours have been the worst 48 hours since I joined the club because many people didn’t support us.” He later added, “I love the fans and we are very happy with the fans,” and in a follow-up said, “I said after the game that I love the Chelsea supporters, they deserve the best, and again, I don’t have nothing to add.”
The manager also pushed back when asked if his remarks were aimed at the club hierarchy, telling reporters, “I was quite clear.” Observers have noted Maresca’s demeanour suggested his grievances were not with supporters or the media, leaving the focus on those in the sporting structure above him.
Chelsea’s decision-making is widely understood to be driven by owners and sporting directors in the BlueCo era, and co-sporting directors Paul Winstanley and Laurence Stewart hold significant responsibility. Reporting has suggested Maresca’s frustrations relate to a need to defend tactics and player rotation, and a sense he may not be fully trusted.
Rotation policy, designed to accelerate the development of young players, has coincided with absences for Cole Palmer, Moisés Caicedo and Levi Colwill and exposed weaknesses during a run of poor results, including the 3–1 defeat to Leeds United. That sequence has prompted scrutiny of substitutions and in-game management from both supporters and, reportedly, internally.
Maresca insisted his commitment remains whole, pledging his “100%” to the role and describing himself as happy at Chelsea. The club will nonetheless carry out the planned end-of-season review of his position in the summer, a process used previously after Mauricio Pochettino’s tenure. The manager’s October decision to align with Jorge Mendes has added another element to the situation.
Ultimately Maresca’s public remarks underline tensions between a manager who is visibly passionate and a club structure that operates by committee. As he himself has shown before, he does not shy from expressing his convictions: “You can feel the fans when they’re not happy,” he said in January 2024. “Probably some people, they take some things for granted. But it’s not like this. Twenty-six wins out of 34, it’s something unbelievable. I arrive in this club to play with this idea. The moment there is some doubt about the idea, the day after, I will leave. It’s so clear. No doubts.”
Chelsea
Chelsea set firm conditions as City chase Fernández
Chelsea have set a deadline and a £120 million price for City’s move for Enzo Fernández.
Chelsea have drawn a clear line in the sand over Enzo Fernández, making Manchester City’s interest in the midfielder a matter of price and timing rather than prolonged negotiation.
According to the draft, City would need to pay $162.1 million (£120 million) to tempt Chelsea into a sale, and any bid must arrive before Friday at 5 p.m. U.K. time, or 12 p.m. ET and 9 a.m. PT. The Athletic first reported the deadline.
That stance reduces the saga to simple terms, but the reality is less straightforward. Since March, Fernández’s future has carried plenty of uncertainty, with teasing comments about his plans leading to an in-house suspension at Chelsea. Since then, the situation has settled, and bridges have been rebuilt.
Xabi Alonso is expected to make regular use of the Argentina international if he remains in west London next season. Last term, Chelsea’s constant coaching changes gave Fernández more Premier League starts and minutes than any other player in the squad.
For City, the attraction is understandable, especially with the influence of Maresca’s appointment helping to encourage interest in a reunion with his former vice-captain. But Chelsea’s valuation is intended to reflect both Fernández’s importance and the difficulty of finding a replacement.
The draft notes that Chelsea would need time to identify a midfielder capable of contributing 10 top-flight goals while also leading the team for chances created and ranking second for possessions won. That profile is rare, and it would not come cheaply in a market already shaped by huge fees for midfielders.
There is also a tactical question. City may need a midfielder if Rodri moves to Barcelona, but Fernández is not an obvious direct fit for that role. He has often played deeper for Chelsea, yet has long seen himself as more effective in attacking areas, saying: “I’ve always felt comfortable playing near the goal, looking for pockets of space so I can create a chance or shoot,” he explained in the past.
Lille’s Ayyoub Bouaddi is mentioned as a more natural Rodri replacement, although he lacks senior experience. For now, Chelsea’s deadline is designed to force a decision, but it remains to be seen whether such an ultimatum will truly decide the outcome.
Arsenal Transfer News
United and Chelsea pass on Arsenal’s Lewis-Skelly amid uncertain future
United and Chelsea have both turned away from Myles Lewis-Skelly as Arsenal weigh their next move.
Manchester United and Chelsea have both reportedly declined the chance to sign Arsenal left back Myles Lewis-Skelly, leaving the teenager’s situation in north London looking increasingly uncertain.
Lewis-Skelly has already shown enough to attract attention. He started the Champions League final, but the match ended in heartbreak for the newly crowned English champions. Even so, Arsenal’s long-term picture still appears positive, though perhaps less so for the 19-year-old.
Recent reports said Arsenal placed a $60.8 million (£45 million) valuation on the England international and made him available to United and Chelsea. According to The Telegraph, both clubs quickly turned down the opportunity. There is also a “strong feeling” the defender has been offered to other clubs as Arsenal continue to move their homegrown talent, with any departure producing pure profit.
Chelsea’s refusal is understandable given their recent business. Marc Cucurella has left the starting left-back role this summer, but the club have already secured Pep Chavarría as his replacement. The former Rayo Vallecano player signed a five-year deal on Wednesday and joined Xabi Alonso’s project for a fee of around $28.8 million. Chelsea have now spent more than $400 million this summer, bringing in Morgan Rogers, Maxence Lacroix and Geovany Quenda, among others.
United remain less active in the market, though they are still looking for a left back and a third midfielder after already signing Andrey Santos and Youri Tielemans. Lewis-Skelly could have covered both positions, but the club seem to be waiting on Newcastle United left back Lewis Hall instead. They have also been linked with Real Madrid’s Eduardo Camavinga, who can operate in midfield and at left back.
Lewis-Skelly’s breakout 2024-25 season was followed by a reduced role last term. Mikel Arteta preferred Piero Hincapié at left back, while Riccardo Calafiori also took minutes in that area. That pushed the teenager into midfield, where he even kept Martín Zubimendi on the bench for the Champions League final and started alongside Declan Rice.
Chelsea
Chavarría begins Chelsea spell with Cucurella comparisons already in view
Chelsea have added Pep Chavarría, a left back with energy, crossing volume and clear ambitions.
Chelsea’s latest arrival, Pep Chavarría, has stepped into a role that naturally invites comparison with Marc Cucurella, even if the numbers do not mirror the full story. The left back has joined on a five-year deal and arrives with the challenge of offering the same kind of value from wide areas after Cucurella’s summer departure.
Chavarría may not share Cucurella’s distinctive image, but he does bring his own case for optimism. Speaking to Chelsea’s in-house media after signing on Wednesday, the 28-year-old outlined a profile built on energy, balance and intensity.
“As a player, I love to attack, defend, box-to-box and I have a lot of intensity,” the 28-year-old told Chelsea ’s in-house media team after he signed a five-year contract on Wednesday. “I have a lot of energy on the pitch. They are my biggest abilities. I have played in Spain all my life, and for me the Premier League is the best league in the world right now, with a lot of quality and intensity. I think that it’s the best league for me.”
The statistical picture is revealing. During the 2025-26 league season, Chavarría attempted far more crosses than Cucurella, posting 97 per 90 compared with 43, while also creating 27 chances. Cucurella, meanwhile, finished with 39 chances created and four assists in 34 appearances. Chavarría made 33 appearances and logged 2,681 minutes.
Rayo Vallecano’s use of him was built around steady service from the flanks, and Chelsea may be looking for a similar outlet more often. The club crossed less frequently than almost half of the Premier League last season, but that pattern could shift under Xabi Alonso.
Alonso is understood to have been the key driver behind the move for his compatriot, which is reported to have cost $28.8 million (€25 million). Chavarría also spoke warmly about settling in, saying, “As a person, I am very friendly and familiar,” and “I’m very happy to be here and I want to meet my new teammates.”
