Arsenal
VAR, Consistency and the Corner That Divided Opinion After Arsenal v West Ham
Post-match controversy over VAR at Arsenal-West Ham focused on inconsistency, rules and refereeing…
Sunday’s stoppage-time VAR intervention that removed West Ham’s late equaliser at Arsenal produced a rare moment of collective dispute across players, managers and pundits. Mikel Arteta described the on-field incident as a “clear foul” on David Raya and praised the officials for what he called a “brave” decision.
The West Ham camp voiced frustration at perceived inconsistency. “Where’s the consistency?” Jarrow Bowen asked BBC Sport. Manager Nuno Espírito Santo admitted he was “upset” by a “lack of consistency.” Keeper Mads Hermansen offered a detailed critique of how tight penalty-area battles are policed. “If you ask any goalkeeper in the league if he’s been illegally blocked, pulled, pushed on corners this season, you will not find anyone who has not experienced this,” Hermansen fumed to The Athletic. “so, to give it today, I’m not sure I understand why. The referee did not explain why when I went to him. We watched it afterwards and we can see there’s short pulls on [Konstantinos] Mavropanos, Souček and Pablo before the goal.”
Arteta defended the officials: “[It’s] a call from the refs that I think is very brave,” he said. “Today I have to praise them, at least for giving the option to a referee to decide. Away from the lights and the chaos, to give clarity to him to make the right call. And when you look at the action in that way, I think it is an obvious error. It is a free kick and the goal has to be disallowed. So congratulations because they made a big call in very, very difficult circumstances.”
Broadcast reaction was largely aligned on the foul being on Raya. “The one thing you say when you go up, VAR are going to check everything, do not put your hands on the goalkeeper!” Roy Keane told Sky Sports. “Certainly don’t leave it on for three or four seconds. There is all sorts going on but because the goalkeeper had such a big part to play, I think it is a foul.” Wayne Rooney called it “a clear foul” on his self-titled podcast. Gary Lineker added caution about earlier grappling: “If I was a West Ham fan—or, indeed, a Manchester City fan—I think I’d be a little bit angry tonight,” he reasoned. “Because there was a lot of fouling going on at that corner, there was a lot of grappling by Arsenal players on the West Ham attackers … I know it was probably a foul on [Raya] but do you not then look at before, when people are being held, which is probably more an obvious foul?” Micah Richards observed: “It depends what camp you’re in. If you’re in Man City’s camp, you’re saying it’s not a foul and [at] Arsenal, you’re saying it’s a foul. It’s as simple as that.”
West Ham intend to seek further clarification and the audio between referee Chris Kavanagh and VAR Darren England, according to BBC Sport. The VAR process lasted two minutes, 41 seconds; the touchline monitor review one minute, 15 seconds; total review time four minutes, 11 seconds. The episode has reignited the long-standing debate over consistency and how the laws should be applied in crowded penalty-area situations.
Arsenal
Arsenal preparing fresh bid for Bruno Guimarães after Newcastle rebuffed opening offer
Arsenal plan a higher offer for Bruno Guimarães after Newcastle rejected an opening $73m bid. Again.
Arsenal are expected to press on for Newcastle United midfielder Bruno Guimarães after their initial approach was rejected. The Daily Mail reported Arsenal’s first bid, described as being in the region of $73 million (£55 million), was bluntly rebuffed and the club now plans to return with an improved offer.
Newcastle’s stance remains firm: club officials have warned suitors that Guimarães is not for sale. On paper that position is backed by contract details. Guimarães is under contract with Newcastle until 2028, meaning the Magpies retain control over any transfer this summer. The draft-first bid came amid a backdrop of financial consideration at St James’ Park.
The club have been open about difficulties complying with Premier League financial rules. Anthony Gordon’s $81 million move to Barcelona has provided relief, but talks over further sales continue as the club evaluates its options. The business case for selling major assets appears to involve midfield departures. Sandro Tonali’s situation is central to those discussions: he is in talks with Tottenham Hotspur, has admirers across the Premier League and Europe, and it is suggested he will be playing for a new club when the new season begins.
Losing Tonali and Guimarães in the same window would represent a severe challenge for Newcastle. The club’s recent progress has been driven in large part by midfield quality, and the potential departure of both players would weaken that foundation. It remains unclear what figure Arsenal will lodge next or whether Newcastle will shift from its current refusal to sell.
Newcastle officials are reportedly growing increasingly concerned and uncertain about Guimarães’s intentions as he enters the final two years of his contract at St James’ Park. Even if money is available, the club must weigh transfer income against potential damage to squad morale if key players signal a desire to leave.
Arsenal
Arsenal’s Initial Approach for Bruno Guimarães Rejected by Newcastle
Arsenal’s bid for Bruno Guimarães was rebuffed as Newcastle insist the midfielder is not for sale.
Arsenal have seen an opening bid for Newcastle United midfielder Bruno Guimarães turned down as the Magpies make clear they do not want to sell. The Daily Mail reported Arsenal held talks with Guimarães’s representatives, and Fabrizio Romano said a “formal approach” had been made.
Sources indicate Arsenal discussed a fee in the region of £55 million ($73 million). Newcastle quickly signalled that they have no interest in selling the Brazil international, who is currently at the World Cup in North America, for what they regard as a low offer.
The decision comes as Newcastle prepare for a summer of transition. The club have already lost Anthony Gordon to Barcelona. Tonali has been strongly linked with moves to Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur. Fullbacks Tino Livramento and Lewis Hall have also been linked with exits, a situation the report ties to Newcastle failing to qualify for European competition next season.
It is unclear whether Arsenal will return with an improved proposal. Guimarães, 28, has two years remaining on his contract at St James’ Park. He has spent four full seasons on Tyneside and has established himself as a consistent performer.
Versatile in midfield, Guimarães can operate as a traditional No. 6 or in a box-to-box role. The former Lyon player combines South American tenacity and industry with creativity and a goalscoring threat. Last season he scored nine goals and provided seven assists from midfield, matching the same number of goal involvements as Premier League Player of the Season nominee Declan Rice.
In the Premier League last term he led Newcastle for goals, assists, chances created and accurate long passes per 90. His average of 9.2 defensive contributions per 90 was bettered by only four teammates. Those attributes underline why Newcastle are reluctant to consider his sale unless a significantly improved offer is made.
Arsenal
Five realistic destinations as Balogun prepares for a new challenge
Balogun linked with Arsenal, Chelsea, Newcastle, Juventus or Dortmund as transfer interest grows….
Folarin Balogun has emerged as one of the most sought-after forwards in the post-World Cup market, with Monaco receiving interest from clubs across Europe and the player reported to be keen on a fresh challenge. Any sale could become the second-highest for a U.S. player, behind only Christian Pulisic’s $73 million switch to Chelsea in 2019.
The forward’s profile suits several different needs. Arsenal represent a natural fit. Balogun came through Arsenal ’s academy but was sold without ever really getting a chance in the first team. Two goals in just 209 senior minutes was impressive but Balogun left with a sense of unfinished business with the Gunners. Arsenal spent big on Viktor Gyökeres last summer but ended the season with Kai Havertz as their starting striker, leaving many believing manager Mikel Arteta may not be entirely satisfied with the options available to him. Bringing Balogun, a homegrown talent, back to the club would be a great move for Arsenal, although whether the 24-year-old would accept such a move without a guarantee of regular starts is a different matter. He has, however, spoken glowingly about the opportunity to be closer to family on brief returns to London.
Chelsea remain a potential suitor despite a crowded forward line. João Pedro has been an excellent addition, but Liam Delap’s time at Stamford Bridge has been a massive disappointment and could be coming to an end this summer. Returning loanee Nicolas Jackson and new signing Emmanuel Emegha add to a bloated forward line. Much will depend on the opinion of new manager Xabi Alonso, who has been given significant influence in Chelsea’s transfer dealings after agreeing to replace Liam Rosenior.
Newcastle could offer minutes and resources. Last summer the Magpies spent heavily on strikers, bringing in Nick Woltemade and Yoane Wissa for around $164 million (£124 million), yet Eddie Howe quickly lost faith in both and is thought to be chasing another starting striker.
Juventus face turnover up front after a mixed window. Jonathan David was solid at best, Loïs Openda is available following a triggered purchase clause, and Dušan Vlahović could depart, creating room for change and a link-up with international teammate McKennie.
Finally, Borussia Dortmund’s record of developing forwards and the chance to capitalise on World Cup momentum make them an appealing option. Across these five destinations, Balogun’s next move will hinge on Monaco’s valuation and the guarantees each club can offer.
-
Burnley2 months agoBurnley confirm Scott Parker exit as Mike Jackson returns; Gerrard reported leading candidate
-
Chelsea1 month agoXabi Alonso’s Chelsea Plan: Three Players Who Stand to Gain and Three Likely to Struggle
-
Arsenal2 months ago2026-27 Premier League Home Kits: confirmed designs, retro nods and sponsor shifts
