Liverpool travelled to the Amex Stadium seeking vital Premier League points and the presence of Mohamed Salah had been in doubt after his midweek exertions in the Champions League. Salah played in the victory over Galatasaray, an evening in which he spurned a huge chance and missed a penalty in the first half before supplying an assist and scoring after the restart.

With about 15 minutes to spare under the Anfield floodlights, Salah signalled to the bench that he needed to be substituted. That request led to his omission from the starting XI against Brighton and prompted concern given the forward’s usual durability and dislike of early withdrawal.

Slot confirmed in Friday’s pre-match press conference that Salah’s request to be removed came after he picked up an injury, although the Dutchman did not elaborate on the specifics. “Indeed, [it’s] unusual. As a result of that I think you can expect the outcome. So, [he’s] not available for tomorrow,” the Liverpool boss told media.

Slot added that the player will miss the upcoming international break with Egypt. “The good thing for Liverpool and for us is that we go to an international break [after Brighton]. The bad thing for Egypt is that he can’t go there,” said the Dutchman.

“We are hoping also with what Mo has shown in the past that he can recover faster than other players might in similar situations because he takes such good care of his body. History has shown that he can be earlier back than some others.

“But it’s only two weeks when we go again so let’s hope in that period of time he can be back.”

Liverpool will return from that break with a FA Cup quarterfinal visit to Manchester City, followed by the first leg of their Champions League last-eight tie with Paris Saint-Germain in France. The squad also had an unusual match-day note: kickoff had been scheduled for 12:30 p.m. GMT but Brighton revealed shortly before midday that the start of the match was delayed.

The surge in transfer prices and squad valuations has reshaped how clubs are measured. The CIES Football Observatory produces those estimates by weighing a player’s quality, age, position and length of contract, and those individual valuations are then summed to give each squad a market value.

The scale is striking. There are nine clubs with squads valued above $1 billion. At the top is Real Madrid with a squad valuation of $1.78 billion and Kylian Mbappé listed as the most valuable player at $221 million. Barcelona follow with $1.60 billion, Lamine Yamal accounting for $403.9 million of that total. Arsenal and Paris Saint-Germain each sit at $1.55 billion, with Bukayo Saka ($131.5 million) and Désiré Doué ($150.3 million) named as their most valuable players respectively.

Liverpool’s roster is valued at $1.20 billion, most valuable player Florian Wirtz ($149.8 million). Bayern Munich come in at $1.15 billion with Michael Olise ($162.6 million) as their top-rated asset. Tottenham’s squad is valued at $1.03 billion; Xavi Simons is listed as their most valuable player ($98.1 million), despite the club’s current relegation fight and Igor Tudor’s assessment that players “are lacking when we attack, we lack the quality to score the goal. We are lacking in the middle to run and we are lacking behind to stay there to suffer and not concede the goal.”

The list also includes Manchester United ($953 million, Benjamin Šeško $100.3 million) and Inter ($942 million, Lautaro Martínez $117 million). Earlier-positioned squads under $1 billion include Atlético Madrid ($903 million, Julián Álvarez $136.5 million), Juventus ($896 million, Kenan Yıldız $152.5 million) and Brighton ($894 million, Diego Gómez $86.4 million).

Several voices in the game have reflected on the market changes. Karl-Heinz Rumminegge said, “There are some players who do not come with a price tag.” Robert Lewandowski complained, “You are young, you score 10 goals in six months and some club will pay 60 or 70 million,” adding, “Before, you had to achieve something.” Vincent Kompany warned players about hype: “I always tell my players, ‘When there’s hype please don’t believe it, you’re not that good.’”

Whether the valuations mirror on-field quality or the inflation of a transfer market remains the central question CIES data brings into focus.

The Premier League Key Match Incidents panel has concluded that Brighton & Hove Albion were wrongly denied a penalty in their 1–0 defeat to Arsenal earlier this month. The panel found that on-field referee Chris Kavanagh should have awarded a spot-kick and that VAR Michael Salisbury was wrong not to intervene.

During the match Kavanagh did not call for a foul and VAR Michael Salisbury cleared the incident, with the Match Centre then taking to social media to confirm “no clear and obvious error” was detected. The KMI panel, which is made up of three former players or coaches and one representative from both the Premier League and Professional Game Match Officials Limited, has now overruled that assessment.

Arsenal’s victory over Brighton took them seven points clear at the top of the standings after Manchester City were held by Nottingham Forest. It is impossible to predict how the award of a penalty for Brighton might have impacted both that specific game and the wider title race. If converted, it would have changed the trajectory of the game, but Arsenal could still have gone on to win.

This is the third time this season that the KMI panel has issued a ruling that has gone against a decision which benefited Arsenal. Earlier this month the panel decided Declan Rice should have conceded a penalty for handball in a 2–1 victory over Chelsea, noting he wrapped his hands around Jorrel Hato and deflected the ball away with his arm. The Blues did score moments later in an unrelated play.

In December the panel ruled that William Saliba was wrongly saved from conceding a penalty against Everton striker Thierno Barry in a game that ended 1–0 in Arsenal’s favor. Salisbury was the VAR for that game as well.

The repeated post-match findings raise questions about the application of video review in key moments and the consistency of on-field and VAR decisions, as highlighted by the panel’s latest statement.