Man Utd
Maguire Agrees One-Year United Contract and, Reportedly, Reduced Salary to Stay
Maguire signs one-year deal at United on reduced pay, turned down higher offers and will miss Leeds.
Harry Maguire has committed to a new one-year contract at Manchester United, with an option to extend for a further 12 months. Reports indicate the decision included a reduction in his weekly pay, a move that keeps the centre back at the club while the squad is adjusted elsewhere.
Michael Carrick has restored Maguire to his first-choice XI in a new-look back four, a system the player says suits him better. With United preparing to rebuild the midfield and aiming to add an extra forward, the club have opted to retain Maguire for at least one more season to reduce the immediate need for another defensive signing.
The Times report that the England international has accepted a new salary below his previous rate of $252,000 (£190,000) per week. In The National, renowned United coverer Andy Mitten adds that Maguire rejected higher wages from other clubs to accept United’s offer, which suits him from a sporting and personal perspective.
On the club website Maguire said: “Representing Manchester United is the ultimate honour. It is a responsibility that makes myself and my family proud every single day,”
He continued: “I am delighted to extend my journey at this incredible club to at least eight seasons and continue to play in front of our special supporters to create more amazing moments together.
“You can feel the ambition and potential of this exciting squad. The determination throughout the whole club to fight for major trophies is clear for everyone to see and I am confident that our best moments together remain ahead of us.”
United sit third in the table and are well placed in the race for Champions League qualification, holding a seven-point buffer ahead of Chelsea in sixth. Maguire will not feature to celebrate his new deal in the next fixture, a Monday evening meeting with Leeds United, after being sent off against Bournemouth before the international break.
Man Utd
United Stagnate at Sunderland as Midfield Void Without Casemiro Goes Unanswered
United’s tame attack and midfield void without Casemiro left them exposed in a goalless draw again.
Manchester United produced a flat, goalless performance at the Stadium of Light, settling for a 0-0 draw that underlined a growing concern in midfield. Michael Carrick’s side were marginally better after the restart, but their tame attacking play left Sunderland largely untroubled and reliant on chances through a soft centre.
Carrick could rely on his defence to preserve a clean sheet, but the absence of Casemiro, who leaves the club at the end of the season, was evident. The Brazilian missed the game through a knock, and United were given a practical glimpse of life without their destructive defensive midfielder. Manuel Ugarte was also absent, so Carrick named Mason Mount alongside Kobbie Mainoo in a double pivot.
Mount did not provide the required defensive protection. In fairness, Mount is not a holding midfielder and was unsurprisingly bullied by more physical opponents, but the lack of resistance in midfield emphasised Casemiro’s value in providing balance. Sunderland exploited the Casemiro-shaped hole in the first half and kept consistent pressure on United.
Carrick adjusted at half time, moving Mainoo into the sole No. 6, pushing Mount further forward and asking Bruno Fernandes to drop slightly deeper. The tweak had limited effect as Sunderland continued to probe and create the better openings.
Player ratings reflected mixed individual displays. Senne Lammens earned redemption with an impressive all-round display between the posts and several timely saves. Noussair Mazraoui held firm against Chemsdine Talbi. Harry Maguire and Lisandro Martínez were largely steady at the back, while Luke Shaw produced another unflappable defensive outing. Up front, Joshua Zirkzee offered little in place of the injured Benjamin Šeško. Amad Diallo showed endeavour but surrendered possession too often. Matheus Cunha was quiet and missed late chances.
Substitutions brought fresh legs but little in the way of a decisive spark. The match ended level, with possession split 50-50, Sunderland xG 1.16 to United 0.57, and Sunderland enjoying 15 shots to United’s 11, including four on target to United’s one.
GK: Senne Lammens—8.9
RB: Noussair Mazraoui—8.2
CB: Harry Maguire—7.1
CB: Lisandro Martínez—7.4
LB: Luke Shaw—6.9
CM: Mason Mount—6.9
CM: Kobbie Mainoo—7.1
RW: Amad Diallo—6.4
AM: Bruno Fernandes—7.4
LW: Matheus Cunha—7.2
ST: Joshua Zirkzee—6.0
SUB: Patrick Dorgu (65’ for Zirkzee)—6.1
SUB: Bryan Mbeumo (75’ for Amad)—5.9
Subs not used: Altay Bayındır (GK), Diogo Dalot, Ayden Heaven, Leny Yoro, Tyrell Malacia, Jack Fletcher, Tyler Fletcher.
Man Utd
United Travel to Sunderland Without Casemiro and Benjamin Šeško
Manchester United travel to Sunderland on Saturday without Casemiro and Benjamin Šeško. Team news…
Manchester United head to Sunderland on Saturday without two of their prominent squad members, Casemiro and Benjamin Šeško. The pair will be absent from the matchday selection, a development that shapes how the team will approach the fixture.
With Casemiro and Benjamin Šeško unavailable, United face a selection challenge that affects both midfield balance and attacking options. Casemiro’s absence reduces the experienced presence typically available in central areas, while the missing forward removes a recognised option in the attacking group. The club will need to adapt its plans for the game to account for those absences.
Tactically, missing two key players for a single match requires adjustments across training and the starting lineup. The squad must cover the minutes and responsibilities those players would normally carry. That will place additional demands on squad members who are selected, and on the coaching staff to reconfigure roles for the match against Sunderland.
On matchday, the equilibrium of the team may look different from recent selections. United’s preparation for the trip will focus on delivering a coherent performance despite the missing players. How the team responds during the ninety minutes will determine the immediate consequences of those absences for the result.
For supporters and observers, the absence of Casemiro and Benjamin Šeško is a clear storyline ahead of the game in Sunderland. It reduces some of the options available but also provides an opportunity for others within the squad to step forward. The outcome on Saturday will show whether the adjustments made in their absence are sufficient for a positive result.
Burnley
How Justified Were Every Premier League Sacking in 2025–26?
A chaotic 2025–26 saw unusually frequent managerial turnover. We rank each sacking by justification.
Only in 2022–23 were there more managerial changes in the Premier League than during the current campaign. Clubs have cycled through coaches as pressure and expectation rose, producing a chaotic season that has lacked continuity across the division. Below is a condensed assessment of the dismissals and how well they stacked up against the circumstances described during the term.
Nottingham Forest: Evangelos Marinakis dismissed Nuno Espírito Santo after just three matches despite the Portuguese coach having secured a surprise Europa League berth the previous campaign. Forest had four points from the opening matches, but Nuno’s public fallout with Marinakis sealed his fate. Supporters were furious; few departures have been less justified in recent years.
Forest (again): Sean Dyche arrived with Forest 18th and left having lifted them to 16th and into the Europa League knockout stage. The football was not always inspiring, but results improved. Just 114 days after his hiring, Dyche was fired, despite the club being 12th based on results under him and his nomination for Manager of the Month in January.
Chelsea: Enzo Maresca left by “mutual consent,” with the club saying a change was necessary. He had delivered the Europa Conference League and Club World Cup in his debut term and returned Chelsea to the Champions League, but progress stalled. Maresca departed on New Year’s Day with Chelsea eighth; his discussions with Manchester City and public disappointment over transfer dealings appeared damaging.
Chelsea (second): Liam Rosenior was promoted after Maresca and won eight of his first 11 games, but internal rumblings and motivational approaches—earning the nickname ‘LinkedIn Liam’—coincided with a drop in results. BlueCo dismissed him after 104 days.
Burnley: Scott Parker could not avoid relegation, the Clarets going down with four matches remaining and just six wins all season. Parker’s exit was described as inevitable given a weak squad following a poor transfer window.
West Ham: Graham Potter lasted 25 matches after being appointed in January 2025 and won 24% of his games, the lowest return of his career. The club sacked him after a dire start that left them 18th.
Manchester United: Ruben Amorim’s debut season finished with United 15th, the club’s lowest Premier League era position, and his changes to formation and subsequent poor performances led to his January dismissal. Michael Carrick has since served as interim head coach.
Tottenham: Thomas Frank initially steadied results, winning four of five early matches and beating Manchester City, but injuries and poor form dragged the club into a relegation fight and he was fired in February. Igor Tudor was then appointed in March, lost five of seven matches, and was removed after heavy defeats including a 3-0 loss to Forest; his spell was one of the shortest and most catastrophic in the period described.
