Chelsea
Malo Gusto Backs Liam Rosenior as Chelsea Navigate Tough Run
Malo Gusto defends Liam Rosenior as Chelsea endure four straight defeats and mounting scrutiny amid.
Malo Gusto has publicly defended Liam Rosenior amid growing criticism of the Chelsea head coach as the club endures a difficult run of form. The France international insisted the squad remain united behind Rosenior and the playing plan he has implemented since arriving in January.
Gusto said: “For us as a team, we have to believe in him, believe in the way we play, to stick to our plan and see how it goes. He is a good person, he is really honest, really simple, you can see that he is really passionate.
“He wants to share it with us his passion for football and I feel like I want to play for him, I want to show my best when he puts me on the pitch.”
The timing of Rosenior’s appointment followed the shock sacking of Enzo Maresca on New Year’s Day. Gusto reflected on that period: “It was a bit complicated for us in the middle of the season when Enzo Maresca was sacked,” the fullback recalled. “So a new coach coming in now, it was a big change I think for the team, everyone was surprised to be honest. But in football that can happen, so we had to adapt.”
Chelsea’s recent results have been mixed. The club drew criticism after conceding late goals to newly promoted sides Leeds United and Burnley, an outcome described in the coverage as the side having “set fire to four points” in Rosenior’s own words. Wins against Aston Villa and Wrexham were followed by a painful sequence of four straight defeats that saw Chelsea ship 12 goals and limp into the March international break.
On the broader picture, Chelsea sit out of European competition this season and are trailing in the race for Champions League qualification amid frequent reports of star players seeking moves away. Gusto dismissed suggestions of unrest. “I think he is a top coach, I saw that a lot of people criticized him,” he said. “Not really. I have worked with him a lot since he joined Chelsea. I think he is a top person first of all, a top manager as well and as you say, he is young. He is a lot of things for the future, but if he is the Chelsea manager it is because he has the talent for this.”
Some criticism has focused on Rosenior’s off-field persona, from social media commentary to his appearance and public remarks. Support from players has also been recorded: Enzo Fernández called Rosenior “a great coach,” while Cole Palmer said: “Life under Liam is amazing, he gives us all confidence. Lets us be ourselves, play free.”
Statistically, in 10 games under Rosenior Chelsea have 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 19 goals scored, 14 conceded, a +5 goal difference and 17 points. Rosenior has altered the team’s pressing approach, a tweak that malfunctioned in the recent 1–0 defeat to Newcastle United earlier this month. As Gusto put it: “We just have to trust the process.”
Chelsea
Chelsea’s final-day permutations to reach Europe
Final-day permutations: Chelsea must better Brighton or rely on Brentford and Sunderland results….
Chelsea enter the Premier League’s final day with European qualification still possible but narrowed to two routes: the Europa League or the Europa Conference League. As 2024–25 Europa Conference League winners and 2025 Club World Cup champions, expectation was higher after another summer of heavy investment. The Blues sit on 52 points and are out of reach of Bournemouth in sixth, meaning the realistic fight is for seventh to 10th.
Newcastle United, Everton and Fulham occupy 11th, 12th and 13th and sit three points behind Chelsea, but would need a significant swing in goal difference to overtake the Blues. The direct contenders for the two European places are Brighton & Hove Albion, Brentford and Sunderland. Going into the final day two points separate the four sides. Seventh place secures Europa League football, eighth place the Conference League.
Table position and goal difference going into the last day are: Brighton +9 on 53 points; Chelsea +7 on 52 points; Brentford +3 on 52 points; Sunderland -7 on 51 points.
Chelsea cannot qualify for the Champions League. To reach the Europa League the Blues must better Brighton’s result. If Brighton beat Manchester United they will finish seventh and take at least Europa League qualification regardless of other outcomes. If Chelsea beat Sunderland they still require Brighton to drop points to move ahead of the Seagulls.
Brentford can overtake Chelsea only if they overturn the goal difference gap. That would require Brentford to beat Liverpool by a margin at Anfield at least four goals greater than Chelsea’s winning margin. A draw at the Stadium of Light still leaves seventh achievable for Chelsea only if Brentford fail to win and Brighton lose to Manchester United by at least two goals.
If Brighton take a point while Brentford do not win, Chelsea would finish eighth. A Brentford victory would see them overtake Chelsea and drop the Blues to ninth. If Chelsea lose to Sunderland, their European hopes end, with both Brighton and Sunderland finishing above them.
Arsenal
Tuchel’s England Midfield: Surprises, Omissions and the Case for Selected Creators
Tuchel’s World Cup midfield choices split opinion, notable omissions and intriguing inclusions. 2026
Thomas Tuchel’s World Cup squad announcement has prompted sharp debate over England’s midfield composition. The depth of options is clear, but several high-profile omissions and a handful of trusted inclusions have defined the list.
Cole Palmer is the absence attracting most attention. Once considered a near-certain pick for North America, an injury-hit start to the 2025–26 campaign interrupted his rhythm. He never fully recovered amid the chaos at Stamford Bridge and has been brutally axed by ex-Blues boss Tuchel.
Nottingham Forest talisman Morgan Gibbs-White was also left out despite a remarkable goalscoring campaign; the 26-year-old appeared to have hit form at the perfect time. Manchester City’s Phil Foden is another notable absentee. Deeper in midfield, Adam Wharton’s omission surprised many after another fine season at Crystal Palace. Strong campaigns from Bournemouth’s Alex Scott and Everton’s James Garner likewise went unrewarded.
Conor Gallagher and Curtis Jones, who have featured in previous squads, were judged not convincing enough this time. James Maddison never stood a chance after missing almost the entirety of the term through injury.
Jordan Henderson’s selection has drawn widespread ire. The 35-year-old is not even a guaranteed starter for Brentford, yet Tuchel has included him for his off-field character and leadership. “He’s unlikely to see too much game time, but he’s a valuable presence in the dressing room.” Whether that presence justifies a place is open to debate.
Among those who did make the cut, Kobbie Mainoo’s technical ability and progressive ball-carrying mark him out as a valuable midfield option after his Euro 2024 breakthrough. Ruben Amorim’s handling of the Manchester United youngster briefly threatened his place, but Michael Carrick’s subsequent reinvigoration returned him to consideration.
Eberechi Eze, typically deployed on the left wing for England but by trade an attacking midfielder, and Aston Villa’s Morgan Rogers, a powerful and direct attacking option, offer distinct profiles. Elliot Anderson’s early England impact suggested he can bridge defence and attack, providing the kind of transitional mettle England may need at a major tournament.
Chelsea
Chelsea readies legal case over Enzo Maresca after reported City talks
Chelsea to seek compensation if Enzo Maresca joins City after alleged talks while at Stamford Bridge
Chelsea are preparing to pursue compensation from Manchester City if Enzo Maresca is appointed as Pep Guardiola’s successor this summer.
The club’s decision follows a turbulent start to the 2025–26 campaign after Maresca’s acrimonious and unforeseen exit from Stamford Bridge in January. Reports in the Telegraph say Chelsea’s argument rests on an allegation that Maresca informed the club of discussions with Manchester City while he remained employed by Chelsea.
Those close to Maresca have told The Guardian that Chelsea would be “entitled to demand a sizeable compensation package” if City appoint him. Compensation demands are routine where a manager under contract is the subject of interest from another club, though the circumstances here are different.
Maresca is no longer employed by Chelsea, which complicates the standard model for compensation. Nevertheless, the club could attempt to show a causal or perceived link between his departure in January and a later move to Manchester City, even with several months between events.
The rapid breakdown of the relationship between Maresca and Chelsea has not been publicly explained in detail. The published reports suggest the club sees potential culpability in what is described as external contact prior to his departure.
Chelsea co-owner Behdad Eghbali has spoken publicly about the exit, saying Maresca wasn’t fired and his departure was “not a change [Chelsea] wanted to make.” He added that he could not say more for legal reasons.
If Chelsea proceed, the dispute would hinge on the timing and content of conversations that reportedly took place while Maresca was employed at Stamford Bridge and on whether those discussions justify a claim against Manchester City. Any formal legal action would aim to secure compensation should City complete an appointment that follows those reports.
