Chelsea
How VAR Has Reshaped the 2025/26 Premier League Table
VAR has altered points in the 2025/26 table, helping some clubs while penalising others unfairly…
Video assistant referees remain divisive across the Premier League, summed up in one line from Burnley’s Kyle Walker: “I like it when it helps us out, and I don’t like it when it doesn’t help us out.” That pragmatic view captures why VAR has produced wildly different outcomes for clubs with less than a fifth of the campaign to play.
The league’s top five and bottom three would be unchanged if every VAR-reviewed goal were ignored, but points totals shift in notable ways. Arsenal’s nine-point lead over Manchester City would shrink to seven in a VAR-less world, “giving Pep Guardiola’s side the chance to move just one behind the Gunners were they to win their game in hand and the meeting between the two teams at the Etihad in April.” Arsenal benefited from VAR on two occasions this season: Viktor Gyökeres was awarded a penalty in the December win at Everton, a match the Premier League later agreed should also have included an Everton spot kick, and VAR confirmed Piero Hincapié was onside for Wolves’ second in a 2–2 draw in February.
Erling Haaland has defended the system: “I think VAR has helped me even more because you get the decision, it’s as simple as that,” and VAR helped Haaland win a penalty after Diego Gómez’s foul in a 1–1 draw with Brighton.
Manchester United are the curious case whose points remain unchanged on aggregate, the result of two decisions canceling each other out. Fulham’s Samu Chukwueze had a strike ruled out for offside at Old Trafford while United led 2–0, then Benjamin Šeško’s stoppage-time winner settled the game. Later, Casemiro had an effort ruled out against West Ham that might have altered conclusions in a VAR-free scenario.
Liverpool would be three points better off without VAR, while Chelsea have gained five points from video interventions, largely in the season’s opening weeks. “We have been very affected by refereeing decisions,” Bournemouth’s Andoni Iraola lamented after two matches with Chelsea featured overturned decisions. Brighton would climb from 10th to sixth without VAR, denied three wins and seven points, including a November penalty that was overturned and several retroactive spot kicks awarded to their opponents. Danny Welbeck even described the toll of narrow offside calls after a goal was disallowed and said it affected how he celebrated a later strike.
Brighton & Hove Albion News
Chelsea’s move for Danny Welbeck would fit the profile of a pragmatic signing
Chelsea’s interest in Danny Welbeck may be unusual, but his goals, experience and value make sense.
Chelsea are said to be “optimistic” about a deal for Brighton & Hove Albion striker Danny Welbeck, with the club now “explore” a transfer for the 35-year-old. The Athletic have confirmed that discussions with Brighton are at an early stage, even as Chelsea continue to be linked with other experienced names, including free agent John Stones and Brentford veteran Jordan Henderson.
Welbeck’s case is built on form, experience and value. The former Arsenal and Manchester United centre forward has settled well on the south coast and produced 13 Premier League goals last season, following 10 in the previous campaign. For a player in the latter stages of his career, that remains a strong return and one that helps explain why Chelsea are considering him.
Alonso is believed to see Welbeck as a “player and leader”, someone who could guide a younger squad while still contributing on the pitch. If the move happened, Welbeck would follow a familiar route from Brighton to Stamford Bridge, with Robert Sánchez, João Pedro and Moisés Caicedo already part of the current squad after leaving the same club.
The approach would sit outside Chelsea’s usual transfer model, which has generally focused on collecting some of the game’s most sought-after young players. Even so, Welbeck could offer qualities the squad has lacked. He is a penalty-box striker who can provide goals, particularly off the bench, and the numbers from last season support that view. Only eight players scored more in the Premier League, while Pedro was the only Chelsea player to finish above him. Among players who attempted at least 30 shots, only four had a better conversion rate than Welbeck’s 23%.
There is also the question of cost. With just 12 months left on his Brighton contract, he could be a relatively inexpensive option, although no fee has been reported. Beyond that, he brings knowledge of the demands placed on players at a traditional “Big Six” club and offers leadership in a dressing room where the oldest squad members are 28.
Chelsea’s forward picture remains unsettled. Pedro is the current first-choice No. 9 after a 20-goal debut season and will be fresh after being left out of Brazil’s World Cup squad. Nicolas Jackson, back from a loan spell at Bayern Munich in which he scored 11 times, is expected to get a chance in preseason. But his future, like those of Marc Guiu, Liam Delap and Emmanuel Emegha, is uncertain.
Chelsea
Morgan Rogers, Palmer and Alonso: How Chelsea May Shape Their New Attack
Alonso has a plan for Rogers, Palmer and Chelsea, but the exact shape remains the key question.
Chelsea’s move for Morgan Rogers has raised the same question many of their previous transfers did: what, exactly, is the long-term idea? Yet this deal appears to be different. Unlike much of the BlueCo recruitment that has come before it, Rogers was signed with Xabi Alonso’s backing, and the new manager has already outlined a clear intention for him.
Alonso spoke this week about Rogers’s adaptability, but his comments pointed towards a central role rather than a permanent place wide on the left. “I think that one of his best qualities is that he’s flexible,” Alonso said. He then added that Rogers is likely to operate in “that pocket position, close to the striker, close to the other 10,” while also noting that the player can work from the right or arrive from the left.
That possibility sits neatly with the assumption that Alonso may lean on a 3-4-2-1, the shape he used so effectively during Bayer Leverkusen’s unbeaten Bundesliga title run in 2023-24. In that system, Rogers could occupy the left-sided No. 10 role, with Cole Palmer alongside him and João Pedro ahead.
There are, however, other clues. Jamie Gittens, who has already felt the impact of tactical shifts in the past, sounded comfortable with the possibility of a wider role. “I think [Alonso’s style can suit him as a winger]. Last season was a 4-3-3 as well with two wingers which is always good, so let’s just see,” he said.
Alonso’s own recent history adds another layer. At Real Madrid last season, he used a 4-3-3 while trying to balance his squad, and this week he stressed that flexibility will remain central. “We will be flexible in our tactics, in our approaches, game plans,” he said. “For sure the ideas, the principles of what we want can be the same. But we have tried and we will try different ideas, mainly because these players have done it.
“So it’s not that I’m changing everything. It’s about updating, developing something that they have done with new concepts that each manager has. But the good thing is that many things that I like they have already done. So now it’s about changing or updating a few other things.”
The biggest tactical issue may be how Rogers and Palmer fit together. Alonso has made clear he wants them on the same side, saying: “I have a plan. I have an idea. I can see them linking really well.” Whether that means a shared central lane in a 3-4-2-1, or one of them drifting wide in a 4-3-3, will shape Chelsea’s attacking balance. A more adventurous option would place both behind a lone midfielder, a setup that may be reserved for weaker opponents.
Chelsea
Chelsea travel to Australia without Emegha, Quenda and Rogers
Chelsea have arrived in Australia without Emegha, Quenda and Rogers, but younger arrivals remain in the squad.
Chelsea have begun their preseason tour in Australia without three summer arrivals, with Emmanuel Emegha, Geovany Quenda and Morgan Rogers all missing from the travelling group.
Emegha and Quenda were both ruled out after minor injuries. Quenda’s absence should be brief, with Simon Johnson reporting that the winger is expected to join up with the squad for the second stage of the tour in Asia. Emegha, by contrast, is expected to spend about three weeks out and will not be back until after the squad returns.
Quenda’s £40 million ($53 million) move from Sporting CP had already been arranged in March 2025. His deal was agreed alongside Dário Essugo, who completed his move last summer.
Chelsea’s squad for the trip includes their goalkeepers Filip Jörgensen, Robert Sánchez, Ted Curd and Teddy Sharman-Lowe. The defensive group features Josh Acheampong, Tosin Adarabioyo, Aarón Anselmino, Levi Colwill, Calvin Diakite, Landon Emenalo, Wesley Fofana, Jorrel Hato, Marco Palestra, Mamadou Sarr and Tayo Subuloye. In midfield are Dário Essugo, Roméo Lavia, Madhi Nicoll-Jazuli, Reggie Walsh and Reggie Watson, while the forwards listed are Liam Delap, Jamie Gittens, Ryan Kavuma-McQueen, Omari Kellyman, Cole Palmer, João Pedro, Dastan Satpeyev and Estêvão.
Rogers is absent for a different reason. The club-record signing is being given time off after his Three Lions World Cup involvement this summer, with FIFA rules requiring players to have at least three weeks’ rest. With England involved until the third-place playoff on July 18, he is not expected at Chelsea’s training ground until early August.
That timeline makes the Aug. 8 friendly against AC Milan likely too soon for him. A first unofficial outing may instead come a week later against Real Sociedad.
Even with several names missing, Chelsea fans will still see some new arrivals in action. Marco Palestra is in the squad, as is Dastan Satpeyev, who does not turn 18 until Aug. 12. The change of manager has given the group a clean slate, and several younger players will hope this becomes their opening to the 2026-27 campaign.
