Manchester United
Maguire Backs Amorim’s System as Manager Stands Firm
Maguire defends Amorim’s 3-4-2-1; Amorim refuses to change his system before Chelsea visit Saturday.
Harry Maguire has pushed back against the idea that Ruben Amorim’s 3-4-2-1 is the cause of Manchester United’s early-season difficulties, arguing that the responsibility lies with the players rather than the formation.
The three-at-the-back approach is not new to the Premier League; Wolverhampton Wanderers and Crystal Palace have adopted similar systems and Antonio Conte won the 2016–17 title with Chelsea in a 3-4-3. Maguire suggested the shape has become an easy target because results have not followed.
“I think the formation is an easy one to go at, because we’re playing something a little bit different to everybody else,” he told Sky Sports . “For me, it just became an easy one to go at when the results don’t work.
“The formation has been fine. Like I said, box to box we been pretty comfortable in every game. Tactically we’ve been comfortable in every game, it’s got to be down to the players. The players have got to take their moments, they’ve got to make the difference in those moments.
“I think this season, the first four games, we just haven’t done them ‘moments’ well enough. And like I said, we haven’t defended in our box well enough in the big moments. Every time the opposing team comes near the box, it ends up in the back of the net, which is something we need to work on.
“But I think the formation is just an easy one to dig out because we’ve not been winning football matches. The formation is not a set formation, everyone says ‘3’ or ‘5’ but in a lot of phases of the game, we play a back four.
“We’ve been happy since the manager has come in. It’s an easy one to dig out, but it’s down to the players to execute. And if you’re a good player, you can play in any formation.”
Amorim, meanwhile, has been unequivocal that he will not abandon his tactical approach and said he will only make changes as part of a process rather than in reaction to pressure ahead of Chelsea’s trip to Old Trafford.
“No one, not even the Pope will change [me],” Amorim stressed. “This is my job, this is my responsibility, this is my life. So, I will not change that.
“There will be an evolution, but we need to make all the good steps. If I’m a player and I have a coach that, with a lot of pressure and all around the world they are saying, ‘You need to change the system’—if I change in this moment, the players will look at me in a different way.
“When you think about the impact that any decision is going to have on the team, everything is important. So, I will say the same thing: this will have to be an evolution. I’m doing things my way. Some guys do it in a different way, but it [results] will change. I hope to have the time to change, but they will change. I’m just trying to win games, trying to see what is the best option to win the next game.
“I’m trying to get the best connections to play better and, in the end, to win points. It’s about belief, confidence, aggression, it’s everything. And sometimes, what we call luck means we will play the game with more belief. Sometimes, with us, I feel the opposite. We are playing well, but something is going to go wrong in some moments. We need to change that, but it’s just with wins.
“I can do whatever, but if you look at the goals against [Manchester] City and Fulham, all these moments can be stopped. In all these moments, I think we can do better. It’s our fault. So we work on that during the week to improve.”
Arsenal
Money Talks: CIES Ranks the World’s Most Valuable Squads
CIES values nine squads over $1bn; Real Madrid leads at $1.78bn while Tottenham exceed $1bn. Values.
The surge in transfer prices and squad valuations has reshaped how clubs are measured. The CIES Football Observatory produces those estimates by weighing a player’s quality, age, position and length of contract, and those individual valuations are then summed to give each squad a market value.
The scale is striking. There are nine clubs with squads valued above $1 billion. At the top is Real Madrid with a squad valuation of $1.78 billion and Kylian Mbappé listed as the most valuable player at $221 million. Barcelona follow with $1.60 billion, Lamine Yamal accounting for $403.9 million of that total. Arsenal and Paris Saint-Germain each sit at $1.55 billion, with Bukayo Saka ($131.5 million) and Désiré Doué ($150.3 million) named as their most valuable players respectively.
Liverpool’s roster is valued at $1.20 billion, most valuable player Florian Wirtz ($149.8 million). Bayern Munich come in at $1.15 billion with Michael Olise ($162.6 million) as their top-rated asset. Tottenham’s squad is valued at $1.03 billion; Xavi Simons is listed as their most valuable player ($98.1 million), despite the club’s current relegation fight and Igor Tudor’s assessment that players “are lacking when we attack, we lack the quality to score the goal. We are lacking in the middle to run and we are lacking behind to stay there to suffer and not concede the goal.”
The list also includes Manchester United ($953 million, Benjamin Šeško $100.3 million) and Inter ($942 million, Lautaro Martínez $117 million). Earlier-positioned squads under $1 billion include Atlético Madrid ($903 million, Julián Álvarez $136.5 million), Juventus ($896 million, Kenan Yıldız $152.5 million) and Brighton ($894 million, Diego Gómez $86.4 million).
Several voices in the game have reflected on the market changes. Karl-Heinz Rumminegge said, “There are some players who do not come with a price tag.” Robert Lewandowski complained, “You are young, you score 10 goals in six months and some club will pay 60 or 70 million,” adding, “Before, you had to achieve something.” Vincent Kompany warned players about hype: “I always tell my players, ‘When there’s hype please don’t believe it, you’re not that good.’”
Whether the valuations mirror on-field quality or the inflation of a transfer market remains the central question CIES data brings into focus.
Man Utd Transfer News
Carrick signals United could seek a different profile to succeed Casemiro
Carrick says United may pursue a different profile to replace Casemiro and addresses Fernandes. plus
Michael Carrick suggested Manchester United may not try to find a direct like-for-like successor to Casemiro this summer, saying the club could take a different approach to the midfield role that has been occupied by the Brazilian.
“Listen, this is totally no disrespect to Case, he’s been fantastic, he’s been a player for us and he’s been important in the dressing room and one that I’ve spoke to and connected with really well,” Carrick said. “But as a club and as a team, players come and go, some are bigger, some are maybe more important than others at different times.
“I don’t think it’s ever really about replacing like for like,” he continued. “I think you can go in a different direction, you understand what the balance of the squad needs, whether that’s on the pitch, off the pitch, leadership, positionally—there’s all sorts of different things going into it.”
At his best, Casemiro combines physicality and technical control, contributing defensively while also offering a threat in attack. His tally of seven Premier League goals this season is more than Amad Diallo, Kobbie Mainoo and Mason Mount have been able to muster between themselves. The piece also notes a vulnerability: an ageing Casemiro can see his positional discipline dip, particularly when fixtures arrive without a clear week of rest.
Finding a player with that blend of attributes would be challenging and expensive, Carrick implied, which is one reason the club might consider a different profile rather than a straight replacement.
Carrick is serving as interim manager and his reign is expected to conclude before the summer transfer window fully opens. He has worked under the assumption his remit remains limited to the current season and transfer discussion under his watch has been minimal.
On Bruno Fernandes, the background remains complex. Back in December, Fernandes revealed that it took the intervention of then-manager Ruben Amorim to prevent his Manchester United exit in the summer of 2025. There were concrete talks over a move to the Saudi Pro League, and his contract reportedly contains a release clause of an undisclosed value.
Manchester United
Rooney and Keane at Odds Over Carrick’s Case for the United Job
Rooney urges United to keep Carrick; Keane doubts his long-term fit but concedes the job is earned.
Two of Manchester United’s most prominent voices have offered sharply different views on Michael Carrick’s prospects of moving from interim to permanent manager. The debate intensified after United’s win over Villa at Old Trafford, where Carrick’s run as caretaker drew praise and scepticism in equal measure.
Wayne Rooney was unequivocal in his backing, saying he “knew” a turnaround was coming when Carrick took charge and insisting the former midfielder “100 per cent” deserves a contract for next season. “I know him very well. I know his character and his personality. It needed a calm head, but someone who knows the place. The players needed some love, and he has given them that,” Rooney said. “We have seen the players play with more quality, more together as a team, and they look like a very strong team. Why would you change?”
The evidence Rooney pointed to includes immediate improvements in performances against Manchester City and Arsenal in January, and a clearer, simpler approach that many associate with the club’s traditional style. Not every display has matched that early standard, but results have largely followed, a practical measure of success at elite level.
Roy Keane offered a contrasting view. The outspoken former captain, openly criticized by Carrick’s wife more than a decade ago prompting surprise beef that seemingly continues to this day, acknowledged Carrick’s progress but would not personally hand him the job. “I would’ve thought [Carrick will become permanent manager] but I wouldn’t [give him the job],” Keane said. “I think there’s better options out there. I think the games where he’s come in and in terms of winning football matches, he’s done a very good job. He’s obviously simplified things but there’s been no jeopardy in those games.”
Keane highlighted Carrick’s lack of experience in European competition and trophy-winning management as a potential drawback. “I think to manage Manchester United, you need someone a lot more experienced in terms of winning trophies, competing in Europe and he hasn’t got that. He might have that in a few years, and he might be in the mix then. But the fact he’s winning football matches at the moment of course gives him a great chance [of getting hired now].”
Keane listed Diego Simeone, Luis Enrique and Thomas Tuchel when asked about alternatives. Tuchel, who was a consideration in the summer of 2024 when United decided to keep faith in Erik ten Hag, might have been an option until recently extending his contract as England manager.
