Liverpool
United and Liverpool Secure Removal of Grok Posts from X After AI-Generated Abuse
Man Utd and Liverpool forced Grok posts off X after AI-produced posts mocking past tragedies online.
Manchester United and Liverpool successfully persuaded the social media platform X to remove a series of posts generated by Grok that clubs described as “sickening and irresponsible.” The posts, reported by The Athletic, referenced the 1958 Munich air disaster, the fatal crowd crush at Hillsborough in 1989 and the tragic passing of Liverpool forward Diogo Jota last summer. The material was taken down later that same Sunday.
The incident underlines how a long-standing problem has migrated into the digital age. What supporters call “tragedy chanting”—the open mocking of events that have caused real human loss—has existed in stadiums and on walls for decades; social media and AI are now extensions of that conduct. The clubs most affected, the two most successful in English soccer history who have both been touched by notable tragedies, have faced this abuse regularly.
In March 2023, the managers of both clubs—then Erik ten Hag and Jürgen Klopp—issued a joint statement on the subject. “It is unacceptable to use the loss of life—in relation to any tragedy—to score points, and it is time for it to stop,” Ten Hag wrote. Klopp added: “We do want the noise, we do want the occasion to be partisan and we do want the atmosphere to be electric. What we do not want is anything that goes beyond this and this applies especially to the kind of chants that have no place in football.” Those words did not end the behaviour.
As recently as February, Nottingham Forest warned fans against tragedy chanting ahead of Liverpool’s visit. Earlier this year a Liverpool supporter received a three-year ban from attending all soccer matches after chanting about the death of two Leeds United fans.
Social media can provide anonymity that facilitates abuse, and the U.K. government has moved to limit how AI tools can be used in this way. Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne called the posts “appalling and completely unacceptable,” predicting that they “will fill the vast majority of fans with horror and disgust.” “It’s shocking and upsetting that hate-filled language like this can be generated by Grok on such a major platform,” Byrne told The Athletic. The member of U.K. parliament also questioned “how this was allowed to happen,” pointing out: “Technology companies have a responsibility to ensure their tools do not produce or amplify abuse.” The Online Safety Act launched in 2023 deems that spreading “threatening communications” is considered a criminal offence. A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said: “These posts are sickening and irresponsible. They go against British values and decency.”
Liverpool
Liverpool’s Immediate Contract Priorities After Gravenberch’s Six-Year Deal
Gravenberch’s six-year deal forces Liverpool to prioritise talks for Jones, Alisson and Mac Allister
Liverpool moved quickly to secure Ryan Gravenberch with a lucrative six-year deal, but the work on longer-term contracts is far from finished. The club’s attempt to avoid a repeat of last year’s contract turmoil concluded positively when two veteran icons remained at Anfield, but fresh choices now lie ahead. With Virgil van Dijk and Mohamed Salah signing two-year extensions in 2025, Liverpool must plan for multiple high-profile expiries and ensure the next core group are committed.
Curtis Jones
The homegrown Curtis Jones has been underused by Arne Slot this season. His ball security in the build-up and ability to break lines with vertical passes are attributes Liverpool have missed at times. Jones can dally in possession and is less effective when used higher upfield, yet his versatility is valued by the manager and he has occasionally been deployed at right back. With 18 months remaining on his contract, Inter and Tottenham Hotspur showed interest in January, and Liverpool briefly seemed open to selling. No move occurred in the winter, Inter are expected to reignite that interest in the summer, and Spurs could require a player of Jones’s profile if they avoid relegation to the Championship. Liverpool have time to decide, but an attractive offer could prove tempting for an academy graduate.
Alisson
The club now risks losing three superstars in one swoop in 2027 because of the two-year extensions agreed for Van Dijk and Salah in 2025. At 33, Alisson still has several strong years left, but his injury history counts against him. He remains one of the world’s best goalkeepers and could command another major contract. Liverpool’s succession plan, Giorgi Mamardashvili, is yet to convince, with not much to go on yet, so the club may need to revisit its approach to the Brazilian’s future. Another extension may be in the offing.
Alexis Mac Allister
Liverpool’s preferred midfield has not changed since last season, and the club may view the summer as the right window to sell Alexis Mac Allister. He has generally been brilliant for the Reds but has disappointed this year. His current deal runs until 2028, meaning Liverpool could still extract strong value now. Real Madrid have only been tenuously linked. The midfielder’s father recently admitted that there has been no development on the new contract front. Mac Allister, who, according to Capology, earns $201,000 (£150,000) weekly, will see Gravenberch’s bumper new deal and potentially believe he’s worth something similar. Liverpool face a significant decision over the 27-year-old’s future.
Highest paid players
Gravenberch Commits Long-Term Future as Liverpool Reward Midfielder with Major Pay Rise
Gravenberch signed a six-year Liverpool contract worth $116.2m, placing him fourth in weekly pay.
Ryan Gravenberch has signed a six-year contract extension with Liverpool, a deal that the club completed to secure the midfielder’s long-term future. The new agreement follows a period of adaptation for the Dutchman after his move from Bayern Munich in a $45.6 million (£34 million) transfer and a reinvention as a holding midfielder on Merseyside.
Liverpool moved to avoid a drawn-out negotiation. Gravenberch’s previous deal was due to expire in 2028, and the club were keen to avoid another protracted saga given what they have experienced with Trent Alexander-Arnold, Mohamed Salah, Virgil van Dijk and Ibrahima Konaté over the past 18 months. The club view their No. 38 as central to long-term plans despite a dip in form amid a disappointing title defence.
According to Dutch outlet De Telegraaf, the contract is worth $116.2 million (€100 million, £86.7 million) across six years, which equates to $19.3 million (€16.6 million, £14.4 million) per year. That works out at roughly $372,000 (€320,000, £277,500) per week, meaning he is almost doubled what he was thought to be earning under his previous contract.
On those reported figures, Gravenberch moves to fourth in the club’s pay hierarchy. Mohamed Salah is reported at $640,000 (£480,000) per week, Virgil van Dijk around $540,000 (£400,000) per week, and Alexander Isak on $400,000 (£300,000) per week. The Telegraph, The Athletic and The Times are among the outlets cited for those numbers.
How Liverpool’s midfield evolves in 2026 remains a subject of interest, particularly with potential managerial change this summer. Alexis Mac Allister has been tenuously linked with a move to Real Madrid, and clubs may enquire about Dominik Szoboszlai should Liverpool fail to qualify for next season’s Champions League. For now, securing Gravenberch on a long-term deal is a clear signal of the club’s intent to build around him.
Chelsea
Big-Money Moves and a Difficult Choice: Chelsea’s $290 Million Barcelona Bid and Liverpool’s Salah Question
Chelsea linked to a $290 million approach for Barcelona; Liverpool confronts a Salah dilemma. today.
Two transfer stories dominate conversation. The first centres on Chelsea and a $290 million Barcelona swoop. The scale of that figure alone signals a significant operation; it suggests a single headline move with far-reaching consequences for squad planning and resource allocation. Whatever the targets or mechanics of the approach, the reported sum frames this as more than a routine deal. It is the kind of transaction that demands strategic clarity and will test decision-making behind the scenes.
The second story is equally stark in tone: Liverpool face a Salah dilemma. The wording captures a club at a crossroads over one of its key figures. The nature of a dilemma implies competing priorities and hard choices. For Liverpool, the challenge will be to reconcile short-term demands with longer-term planning, balancing on-field needs against broader considerations.
Taken together, the two items set a clear narrative about how clubs are navigating a demanding market. Chelsea’s reported $290 million move for Barcelona and Liverpool’s current dilemma over Salah are separate stories, but both point to pressure points in modern squad construction. Each situation raises questions about allocation of funds, timing and the appetite for decisive action.
For observers, the immediate task is to monitor how each club proceeds. Chelsea’s manoeuvre, by virtue of headline valuation, will attract scrutiny on its structure and intent. Liverpool’s dilemma will invite close attention to the choices available and the signals sent by any resolution. Both developments will shape short-term headlines and have potential implications for the clubs involved.
These are not isolated narratives. They are examples of the dilemmas and decisions that define transfer periods: large sums prompting strategic responses and club dilemmas demanding careful judgment. The coming days will reveal whether the reported figure and the described dilemma evolve into agreement, compromise or further negotiation.
