Chelsea
Chelsea receive positive update on Reece James as issue deemed ‘minor’ and ‘ongoing’
Chelsea expect Reece James to return soon after an ailment described as “minor” and “ongoing” in Oct.
Chelsea have been given cause for optimism over Reece James after reports suggested the right-back’s current problem is not severe. The defender, who has missed no fewer than 68 games for club and country since the start of the 2023–24 season, is not believed to face a long-term layoff.
The Telegraph’s Matt Law reports James’s current ailment is both “minor” and “ongoing”. BBC Sport’s Nizaar Kinzella states that while James would have missed the two England games anyway, the decision to remove him from the squad was more of a precaution, rather than an enforced problem.
Inside Chelsea there is confidence the club captain will be available when domestic fixtures resume. Maresca’s side are next scheduled to travel to Nottingham Forest on Oct. 18.
Given James’s well-documented injury history, Maresca has been careful in managing his minutes, aiming to shield him from a congested calendar and prioritise recovery. Last season James was omitted from the league phase squad for the Conference League but returned to take a rotation role across competitions, with Malo Gusto commonly deployed as his deputy.
Recent team selection suggests progress. James has started four of Chelsea’s last six matches, was absent for the Carabao Cup victory over Lincoln City and was introduced as a late substitute to help see out the win over Benfica.
There is also optimism regarding Moisés Caicedo after the international break. Caicedo was left out of the Ecuador squad and is not believed to be injured; the midfielder has been rested to avoid unnecessary risk during an international window comprised of two friendlies.
Chelsea will hope the cautious approach pays off as they prepare to return to league action and seek stability from their defensive spine.
Chelsea
Maresca Urges Value of Experience as Chelsea’s Youth-First Transfer Policy Draws Scrutiny
Maresca stresses that senior pros are ‘invaluable’ as Chelsea follows a youth-led transfer plan…
A week of self-inflicted scrutiny over his relationship with the club’s upper management continued to simmer after Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca publicly highlighted the worth of experienced players, calling that influence “invaluable.” What began with a question about Malo Gusto’s form snowballed into a cryptic swipe at the “worst 48 hours” of his Chelsea tenure after he said he had faced a lack of support from “many people.” Those comments were left unexplained and were further inflamed by reports that Manchester City consider Maresca to be a suitable replacement for Pep Guardiola, though the manager played down those rumours.
“When you have 20 and 21-year-olds and a player who is 30 or 31, and he starts to say something to them, it’s invaluable. But it’s the strategy of the club,” Maresca lamented to TNT Sports before his young starting XI shipped two first-half goals. On the weekend the Blues fielded Robert Sánchez, 28, as their oldest player on the pitch. Tosin Adarabioyo, who turned 28 in September, is the oldest member of Maresca’s Premier League squad, which contains 12 players aged 21 or under.
Chelsea again boast the youngest squad in the Premier League, with an average age of 24.7 this season. In 2021–22, before the current ownership, the club ranked 15th in that metric with an average age of 27.4. Maresca described the current profile as the product of a deliberate transfer strategy focused on youth. Chelsea have not spent money on a player over the age of 25 since co-sporting directors Laurence Stewart and Paul Winstanley joined the club in 2022.
“It’s not fair to paint Maresca as distrustful of youth,” he insisted himself. “I love the squad, I love young players,” he said earlier this week. Still, he repeated that his remit is limited. “I just focus on what I can control—pitch-side,” he clarified, “knowing that there is always noise you need to manage.” After a poor first half and a stronger second-half performance he added: “My message at the end of the game is, for sure in the first half we could do better, but the character they showed in the second half should make them proud,” he told assembled media. On the recent turmoil he concluded: “My last week has not been complicated. It has been good,” he claimed.
Chelsea
How VAR and the Referee Upheld No Penalty in Newcastle v Chelsea
VAR confirmed no penalty as Chalobah’s contact was judged shielding; match in Tyneside finished 1-1.
Saturday’s lunchtime meeting between Newcastle United and Chelsea produced a high-energy, two‑halves encounter and a refereeing debate that dominated the postmatch discussion. Chelsea were blunt in the first half and could have been substantially behind at the interval, while a second-half Reece James free-kick brought the visitors back into the game. Aaron Ramsdale may feel he could have done more to keep that set-piece out.
The key controversy followed a heavy collision between Gordon and Trevoh Chalobah. Referee Andy Madley waved play on and VAR Peter Bankes reviewed the incident after an earlier semi-automated offside problem had already led to scrutiny of Woltemade’s goal. Supporters in the Gallowgate End and commentators on the TNT Sports coverage were vociferous; Ally McCoist described the challenge as “stonewall.” Joe Cole said Chalobah had been overly forceful and that it was a penalty.
VAR’s assessment was later summarised on the Premier League Match Centre’s X account: “The referee’s call of no penalty to Newcastle was checked and confirmed by VAR—with the contact from Chalobah on Gordon deemed to be side-to-side in a shielding action and the ball within playing distance.” Former referee Darren Cann echoed the view that the incident was open to interpretation. “At normal speed I can understand why the referee didn’t award a penalty. Chalobah certainly takes a risk in making such a challenge because there’s clear contact with Gordon,” he told BBC Sport. “So the decision was right to be reviewed by VAR, who came to the conclusion that a clear and obvious error had not been made and stayed with the on-field decision of no penalty. I do think that had a penalty been given, I believe the VAR would have stuck with that decision too. So this comes down to ‘referee’s call.’”
Newcastle manager Eddie Howe told TNT Sports: “In my opinion, yes. I think it’s a clear penalty, I think anywhere else on the pitch that’s a free-kick, the player’s gone into Anthony aggressively, too aggressively in my opinion. I think it’s a stonewall. No, because it’s not [side by side shielding]. I think the defender’s only look is Anthony and not the ball, I think it’s too aggressive.”
Ten minutes after the incident João Pedro levelled for Chelsea with his fifth Premier League goal of the season and the match finished 1-1. The decision on the Chalobah challenge remained the defining talking point from a lively midday fixture on Tyneside.
Chelsea
Chelsea recover from 2-0 deficit to claim 2-2 draw at St James’ Park
Chelsea rallied from two goals down to earn a 2-2 draw at St James’ Park with pivotal goals. late on
Chelsea produced a spirited second-half response to rescue a 2-2 draw at St James’ Park after falling two goals behind inside the opening quarter of an intense fixture. Nick Woltemade struck twice early on — the second following a superb Anthony Gordon delivery that survived a VAR check — and the Blues seemed entirely outplayed through the first 45 minutes.
Enzo Maresca’s side improved dramatically after the interval. Reece James revived Chelsea with an exquisite free kick from wide range that curled off the inside of the post, and João Pedro completed the comeback after keeping Robert Sánchez’s long kick alive and racing through following Malick Thiaw’s slip to slot the equaliser.
The game was physical and heated throughout, producing 10 yellow cards and a late VAR review that could have produced a red card for James after a pull on Harvey Barnes, but no dismissal followed. James also made a crucial last-ditch tackle on Barnes that prevented a near-certain goal.
Individual ratings reflected a mixture of defensive lapses and moments of quality. Robert Sánchez was the standout on the day, making two excellent saves inside the opening 10 minutes, unable to stop the rebound for Woltemade’s first but playing a key role in keeping Chelsea in the match and contributing to the move that led to Pedro’s goal (8.2). Moisés Caicedo was one of the few to impress in a difficult first half, charging into tackles and anchoring a disorganised backline (8.1). João Pedro showed composure to finish the equaliser (7.9). Reece James offered both defensive cover and the free-kick that changed the game (7.5). Trevoh Chalobah steadied after a shaky start and escaped a penalty call after a forceful challenge (7.1).
Malo Gusto struggled defensively and was booked, while Cole Palmer and Pedro Neto provided threats after the restart without producing decisive moments. Enzo Fernández and Andrey Santos were introduced from the bench with steady contributions.
Chelsea made 10 changes from the team that beat Cardiff in the Carabao Cup on Tuesday night as Enzo Maresca reverted to a familiar lineup. The Blues left Tyneside with a point after a match that swung sharply between control and chaos.
