Connect with us

Analytics & Stats

What Manchester United Must Learn After Carrick’s First Loss

Carrick’s first defeat shows missed big chances, midfield imbalance and the thin margins in results.

Published

on

Michael Carrick’s first defeat since becoming interim manager in January exposed several clear lessons for Manchester United. The run that followed his appointment — six wins from his first seven games, a draw with West Ham United and an unbeaten stretch that, when combined with his 2021 caretaker spell, extended to nine league matches — had masked deeper issues. Only Herbert Bamlett (1927) and Ole Gunnar Solskjær (2018–19) had matched similar starts in the club’s history.

Senne Lammens called the performance at St James’s Park a “a collective off-day” that the players now “have to learn from.” Since beating Arsenal on Jan. 25, Manchester United haven’t been brilliant. Results continued largely because of resilience rather than dominance: the Fulham victory required a 94th-minute winner from Benjamin Šeško; Spurs spent more than half the game with 10 men after Cristian Romero’s red card; Everton was another narrow win courtesy of Šeško; and United were trailing against Crystal Palace until the Eagles were reduced to 10 early in the second half.

Newcastle followed a similar pattern. Even after the Magpies had a player sent off in the first half, a Newcastle penalty and an individual strike from William Osula turned a potential narrow victory into a narrow defeat. FotMob’s numbers underline the difference: United led overall attempts (14–12), shots on target excluding penalties (5–4) and ‘big chances’ (4–3), but missed three ‘big chances’ to Newcastle’s two. That matched the total of big chances missed across the three previous matches combined.

Casemiro scored United’s equaliser deep into first-half stoppage time, his 36th goal involvement since joining the club, but he is a traditional No. 6 and is leaving in a matter of months. Kobbie Mainoo offers quality as a deep-lying playmaker, yet United lack an all-round box-to-box engine on the scale of Sandro Tonali, Declan Rice, Moisés Caicedo or Tijjani Reijnders. Under Sir Alex Ferguson, United often recruited opponents’ best performers — Wayne Rooney, Roy Keane, Andy Cole, Dwight Yorke, Teddy Sheringham, Robin van Persie and even Carrick himself — which makes Tonali a summer target to consider.

Advertisement

Time in-season is precious; fixture congestion after Christmas leaves little room to regroup. That scarcity of recovery and reflection only increases the cost of missed chances and midfield imbalance.

Analytics & Stats

Opta Supercomputer: Tight Premier League Relegation Picture After Tottenham Defeat

Opta’s model predicts a close relegation battle: Leeds, Tottenham, Forest and West Ham all involved

Published

on

The relegation battle in the 2025/26 Premier League tightened significantly after Tottenham Hotspur’s 3-1 defeat to Crystal Palace. Positive results for West Ham United (a 1-0 win over Fulham) and Nottingham Forest (a 2-2 draw at Manchester City) left both clubs level on 28 points and intensified the fight at the bottom.

Leeds United remain precarious. Daniel Farke’s side sit 15th, just three points clear of the current relegation group, making this a contest that could shift quickly.

Opta’s supercomputer produces the following projection for the bottom six:

– Leeds: current 31 points, expected 42.09, relegation chance 8.09%
– Tottenham: current 29 points, expected 40.04, relegation chance 16.10%
– Nottingham Forest: current 28 points, expected 39.08, relegation chance 26.88%
– West Ham: current 28 points, expected 37.49, relegation chance 49.53%
– Burnley: current 19 points, expected 27.07, relegation chance 99.36%
– Wolves: current 16 points, expected 24.62, relegation chance 99.92%

Advertisement

Wolverhampton Wanderers have improved form after a draw with Arsenal and successive wins over Aston Villa and Liverpool, but the supercomputer underlines that their season was effectively over months ago, with the club not recording a victory until the 20th game. Burnley sit 10 points adrift; Opta’s model projects only eight more points for the Clarets and expects their return to the Championship to be confirmed well before the final day.

The model largely maintains the current ordering and gives West Ham the highest chance of relegation among the quartet fighting to avoid the drop into the second tier. Forest are forecast to finish two points clear of the relegation places, with Tottenham projected to reach 40.04 points and stand as the final side to reach the 40-point threshold. Opta assigns a 16.10% chance of relegation to Igor Tudor’s side, a near doubling of their previous prediction before Thursday’s defeat. The fixture between Tottenham and Forest on March 22 now carries clear significance for both clubs.

Continue Reading

Analytics & Stats

Opta Rankings: Which Premier League Sides Have the Hardest Remaining Fixtures

Opta rankings expose which Premier League sides face the toughest remaining fixtures this season…

Published

on

We are deep into the final quarter of the Premier League season and Opta’s Power Rankings make clear which clubs face the steepest tests. The dataset lists mean difficulty scores for each side’s remaining fixtures, with Wolves (88.83) and Leeds (89.38) among the friendlier schedules and Everton (92.57) and Crystal Palace (92.30) toward the more difficult end.

The full set of mean difficulty figures runs from Wolves at 88.83 up to Everton at 92.57, with notable entries including Brighton (90.13), Aston Villa (90.28), Arsenal (90.30), Tottenham (90.49), Brentford (90.64), Nottingham Forest (90.72), Sunderland (91.06), Newcastle (91.21), Manchester United (91.33), Bournemouth (91.40), Fulham (91.40), Manchester City (91.44), Liverpool (91.52), Burnley (91.66), Chelsea (91.70), West Ham (92.01), Crystal Palace (92.30) and Everton (92.57).

Chelsea supporters will be concerned: Opta shows the Blues have the highest mean difficulty among the top-seven sides. The report notes Chelsea have taken points from Liverpool, Manchester City and Aston Villa, and still have to face Liverpool and Manchester City again.

In the title race, the rankings suggest Arsenal hold a scheduling edge over Manchester City. Arsenal’s only remaining match against a current top-seven side is the trip to City in April. City, by contrast, still face Chelsea, Aston Villa and Arsenal, plus potentially testing away fixtures at Everton and Bournemouth.

Advertisement

Aston Villa, meanwhile, register one of the clearest runs among the teams competing for Champions League qualification, with a relatively straightforward closing schedule according to the numbers.

Manchester United and Liverpool both confront tricky finishes as they chase a top-five place; United’s path includes games against Villa, Chelsea and Liverpool, while Liverpool must play Chelsea, Villa and travel to Old Trafford in the closing weeks.

At the other end, Tottenham, Leeds, Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth occupy varied positions on the difficulty scale, with Leeds and Wolves among the clubs with the kinder runs remaining.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Analytics & Stats

Arteta Defends Arsenal’s Set-Piece Methods as Peers Criticise; Guardiola Urges Adaptation

Arteta defends Arsenal corners after wider criticism; Guardiola insists coaches must adapt on pitch.

Published

on

A growing chorus of Premier League managers has taken aim at Arsenal’s set-piece methods, but Mikel Arteta has framed the debate differently: his main concern is that his team have not converted enough dead-ball opportunities.

Liverpool’s Arne Slot led the criticism, lamenting how “his heart as a former player” doesn’t like the rough treatment in penalty boxes. “Here, you can almost hit a goalkeeper in the face and the referee still says, ‘Play on,’” he claimed. Brighton boss Fabian Hürzeler attacked Arsenal’s corner routines more directly: “For me, the main topic is [to] make a clear rule how much time you can waste for a corner, for a throw-in, for a free-kick,” Hürzeler fumed in midweek. “When Arsenal has a corner and they are leading, sometimes they spend over one minute just to take a corner.”

Opta data underpins that complaint: Arsenal take an average of four minutes and 18 seconds to prepare for corners each game, the most in the division. The piece noted it would be quicker to drive from London to Brighton (one hour, 56 minutes) than watch a supercut of Arsenal’s preparations for corner kicks over the course of the entire season (two hours, five minutes).

Michael Carrick added his voice: “It wasn’t long ago we were told you couldn’t lay a hand on anyone in the box and it would be stamped out,” he grumbled. “It’s crept in. The success of set pieces, corners in particular, probably in terms of being able to put so many bodies close together, has made more teams do it because the success rate is so high.

Advertisement

“It’s understandable why there are so many teams doing it. As a game, it doesn’t feel like we’ve got that balance right.”

Arteta, refusing to be drawn on the timing criticism, called it “part of the job.” He added: “I am upset we haven’t scored more and that we have conceded [from set pieces] as well. We want to be the best and most dominant team in every aspect of the game. That is the trajectory and the aim of this team.”

Arteta argued the broader issue is the evolution of man-to-man marking: “There are phases, and there are moments when a team has an opportunity to do certain things, and the game is evolving, and the game is becoming more and more difficult [in open play],” he fretted. He pointed to a Chelsea match in which Liam Rosenior’s use of Cole Palmer and Enzo Fernández bamboozled Martín Zubimendi. Arteta adjusted the brief so Zubimendi would only deal with Fernández while one of Gabriel or William Saliba tracked Palmer; Chelsea scarcely had a sniff thereafter.

WhoScored data shows set-piece goals across major leagues: Premier League 202 (25.6%), Serie A 155 (23.6%), Bundesliga 145 (21.2%), La Liga 128 (18.6%), Ligue 1 99 (16.4%).

Advertisement

Pep Guardiola chose restraint. “I understand completely the reason why Arne said that and in some aspects I agree,” Guardiola conceded. “You can sit and complain, but you have to adapt,” Manchester City’s revered tactician insisted. “You have to adapt and especially adapt in the way it is whistled [refereed] and conducted in the Premier League.” He added: “Football is about how, when the opponents create problems for you, you have to find a solution.”

Continue Reading

Trending