Connect with us

Manchester United News

How Manchester United’s Amorim Exit Deepens a Growing Managerial Bill

United face up to £26.9m for Amorim and £10.4m for Ten Hag, a combined £37.3m managerial bill to date

Published

on

Manchester United have disclosed they have set aside a maximum of $21.5 million (£15.9 million) in potential compensation related to Ruben Amorim after sacking the manager at the start of the year. The club said factors such as Amorim not finding another job within a specified period will be taken into account, according to a Guardian report.

The figure means the cost of bringing Amorim to Old Trafford is likely to exceed the initial outlay. United paid £11 million to buy Amorim out of his contract with Sporting CP, but terminating his deal so soon after the departure of Erik ten Hag has pushed the total to a far higher level.

Ten Hag’s own exit proved costly. The club had ended a review of his position with a new two-year contract in July 2024, only to sack him a few months later at a cost of £10.4 million. Taken together, the potential £26.9 million linked to Amorim and the £10.4 million for Ten Hag mean INEOS are now up to £37.3 million solely on hiring and firing managers.

That sum does not include wages or day-to-day expenses. While it may not compare with the largest transfer fees, it is a significant financial burden for a club that made many staff members redundant as part of controversial cost-cutting measures.

Advertisement

There is also a structural problem. Unlike players, managers at the elite level are rarely tradable. Big-name bosses do not commonly move between clubs for a transfer fee; they leave when they are sacked or when they choose to walk away. Clubs can recoup value on a struggling striker, but there is no buyers market for an underachieving manager.

The potential £26.9 million spent on Amorim is money that cannot be recovered through a transfer and can only be recouped by other means. Finding the funds to cover another significant compensation fee will not be easy for United, who may prefer to pursue an out-of-work manager in the summer.

Manchester United

Jack Fletcher handed six-match suspension and fine after U21s incident

Jack Fletcher suspended six matches for using a discriminatory term in the U21s match; fined $2,005.

Published

on

Manchester United midfielder Jack Fletcher has been suspended for six matches after using a discriminatory term during an appearance for the club’s U21s in October 2025.

At the hearing on Feb. 3, which was a paper hearing not attended by any party, Fletcher accepted that he used the term “gay boy” towards an opponent but contested that it was a homophobic slur. He argued it was uttered in response to two earlier off-ball fouls that had been reported to the referee and to subsequent comments about his father and twin brother. The exact words recorded in the published FA verdict were: “You seem to know a lot about me, are you a gay boy?” The presiding commission accepted the context put forward by Fletcher “for the purposes of assessing the appropriate sanction.”

The breach carried an automatic suspension of six to 12 matches; the FA issued the minimum six-match ban. The relative leniency reflected his acceptance of the charge, the context he supplied and the “immediate remorse” he expressed in his witness statement and interview. The FA summary noted: “Fletcher stated that he is not homophobic, does not ordinarily use such language, and did not intend the remark to be an intentional homophobic insult.”

Fletcher was also fined $2,005 (£1,500) and ordered to attend a mandatory “face-to-face education programme” that must be completed before June 2. The player said: “I am truly sorry for the offensive word that I used in the heat of the moment,” and added: “Despite the fact that I had no intention to use the term as a homophobic insult, I completely understand that such language is unacceptable and immediately apologised after the game. I want to be clear that this momentary lapse of character absolutely does not reflect my beliefs or values.”

Advertisement

His club issued a statement outlining support and education: “Manchester United has worked with Jack to strengthen his understanding of discriminatory language, and why it is harmful. In addition to his ongoing participation in regular Academy programmes on diversity and inclusion, Jack will also take part in educational training through the FA.

“Manchester United prides itself on being an inclusive and welcoming club. Since launching All Red All Equal in 2016, we have embedded equality, diversity and inclusion into everything we do.”

Fletcher was sent off in the game, an S6 offence for using offensive, insulting or abusive language. He was initially banned for one EFL Trophy match automatically and one further match; the disciplinary hearing added four extra matches described as four non-first team competitive fixtures in approved competitions.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Manchester United

Carrick issue leaves United weighing makeshift defence for Newcastle trip

Carrick confirms doubts over Harry Maguire and Luke Shaw ahead of Newcastle defensive choices. today

Published

on

Michael Carrick has raised doubts over the availability of two senior defenders ahead of Manchester United’s Wednesday night Premier League visit to Newcastle United, prompting a potential reshuffle at the back.

“We’re working towards it,” Carrick told reporters on the health of Maguire and Shaw.

“They weren’t feeling too good [against Crystal Palace]. We’ve still got a little bit of time to the game and we will just have to see how they feel. So we’ll obviously give them every chance.

“It wasn’t injury, it’s just both of them weren’t feeling too good. It’s one of those things really. But we’ll just have to see how they are [the rest of Tuesday] and [Wednesday] morning.”

Advertisement

Those comments leave United without three established defensive options. Matthijs de Ligt has been sidelined since November and Patrick Dorgu is not expected back until late March or early April. That means Diogo Dalot is the only usual defensive starter definitely available for the trip. Senne Lammens will continue in goal, but the unit in front of him could look very different.

If Maguire cannot recover, Carrick could turn to a young centre-back pairing. Leny Yoro, who has deputised for Martínez in recent matches, and Ayden Heaven are both prospects aged 20 and 19 respectively, and both are described as raw.

At left-back, the obvious replacement if Luke Shaw is absent is Noussair Mazraoui. The Morocco international can operate on either flank and filled in at left against Crystal Palace. Dalot has been shifted from the right in the past to accommodate Mazraoui. Ruben Amorim was in charge the last time Mazraoui started a game for United. Mazraoui also missed part of the festive period due to the Africa Cup of Nations and is generally considered behind Shaw and Dalot in the fullback pecking order.

Carrick’s injury updates complicate selection for a fixture where defensive cohesion will matter. United head to Newcastle having climbed into the top three after the weekend, leapfrogging Aston Villa thanks to six wins from seven matches since Carrick became interim manager in January. The club spent the majority of 2024–25 in the table’s bottom half and last occupied third in May 2023.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Man Utd

Assistant Cândido: United never fully put Amorim’s ideas into practice

Adélio Cândido says United failed to implement Amorim’s ideas fully during a turbulent 14 months…

Published

on

Adélio Cândido, the assistant to Ruben Amorim during a 14-month spell at Old Trafford, has offered a clear account of what he sees as the key shortcoming of that tenure: the coach’s methods were not fully applied.

The period began with a draw and two wins in Amorim’s first three matches, including a 4–0 victory over Everton that hinted at early promise. Amorim warned that “the storm is coming.” That warning was borne out as inconsistent results followed and, in January, Amorim and his backroom staff were dismissed.

The Angola-born coach told A BOLA: “Experience is always experience, whether the outcome is good or bad, we always come away with learning.” He added: “In Manchester, I really liked the city and the way the fans experience football, more focused on the project than on the immediate result. What I liked least was, without a doubt, feeling that our ideas weren’t fully implemented.”

Cândido rejected suggestions that pressure derailed daily routines. “With the existing pressure, it’s normal for people to get more upset than usual on a coaching staff, and that wasn’t the case for us,” he said.

Advertisement

Cândido declined to comment on the club’s resurgence under Michael Carrick, who now has the same players and is getting better results. Benjamin Šeško admitted that the squad have cranked up their work ethic under Carrick, and Lisandro Martínez praised Carrick’s soft touch. Luke Shaw said the “biggest” difference between Amorim and his successor is that Carrick “knows the club.”

Matheus Cunha offered an inside explanation for the struggles, blaming the intense scrutiny of Amorim’s 3-4-2-1: “The pressure for that tactic to work was so great that we forgot how simple the overall context was and focused too much on the negative.”

Amorim persisted with a back three for his first 60 games and defended his approach when forced into makeshift selections for a Boxing Day trip to Newcastle United. He argued, “We don’t have a lot of players, and we need to adapt, so they understand why we are changing,” and added: “It is not because of the pressure of you guys [media], or the fans. When you [media] talk about changing the system all the time, I cannot change because the players will understand I’m changing because of you and I think that is the end for the manager. When we are playing well in our system, that is the moment to change.”

In the end, a clash with director of football Jason Wilcox precipitated Amorim’s exit. The tenure included heavy spending of around $330 million across two full transfer windows and controversial decisions over Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho, as well as January 2025 signings such as Patrick Dorgu and acquisitions including Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo that aligned with Amorim’s preferred system. As the January 2026 window approached, Amorim grew increasingly frustrated at the perceived lack of backing in midfield.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending