Connect with us

Man Utd

Keane Condemns United’s Boardroom Influence and Questions Recruitment of Managers

Keane says Ferguson and Gill’s continued presence creates a ‘bad smell’ over United’s succession. etc.

Published

on

Roy Keane launched a pointed criticism of Manchester United’s leadership this week, arguing that the continued presence of former figures has hampered successive managers. The former club captain singled out Sir Alex Ferguson and David Gill as lingering influences and suggested their roles on the club board remain a problem.

“You see who’s making the decisions at Manchester United ,” Keane tailed off during a rant on Sky Sports this week, “you still have Ferguson and David Gill hanging on like a bad smell.” Ferguson and Gill remain non-executive directors and regular figures at Old Trafford, a reality Keane said affects those appointed after Ferguson left the dugout.

The club’s history was used as context. United hold a joint-record 20 top-flight titles but only three managers are responsible for those successes. Ernest Mangnall led in the first decade of the 20th century, Sir Matt Busby oversaw the club’s peak across the 1950s and 1960s, and Ferguson later dominated for decades. Busby, like Ferguson, did not fully relinquish influence when stepping away. After appointing Wilf McGuinness as his successor in 1969, Busby kept the title of manager while McGuinness was designated “chief coach.”

“Not everyone, sadly, would play for Wilf,” United’s David Sadler would later reflect. “The side as a whole did not give 100% effort for him. It was as simple as that.” Busby returned for an ultimately doomed second spell, a fate Ferguson has so far avoided.

Advertisement

Keane also directed his ire at the club’s recent recruitment and decision-making, criticising minority co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and director Jason Wilcox for their roles during Ruben Amorim’s “disastrous 14-month reign.” “What happens in these job interviews? I’m intrigued,” Keane asked, his beady eyes dancing around the Sky Sports studio. “Why do they keep giving certain people a job? What happens in the interview that they sit there and go, and 12, 14 months later, ‘he’s not the guy for us.’

“Almost forget the CV,” he added. “You need something on your CV, of course, that you’ve won a trophy or managed a long time. But you’ve got to look somebody in the eye and go, ‘Are you the man to get us places?’” Keane dismissed the idea of Darren Fletcher as the permanent manager and expressed a preference for Eddie Howe.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Man Utd

United’s Left-Back Gamble Leaves Carrick Short Again

United strengthened midfield but left back remains unresolved, and Carrick must manage until January.

Published

on

Manchester United spent the summer reshaping one part of the squad while leaving another unresolved, and the decision is already showing its limits. Michael Carrick had identified left back as a priority at one stage of the window, but the club never delivered the reinforcement he wanted.

United explored several options. A move for Lewis Hall was attempted, but Newcastle United would not shift. After Carrick clarified his preferences, the club also looked at Arsenal’s Miles Lewis-Skelly, according to Ornstein. Even so, attention soon moved elsewhere as United pushed through a third midfield signing of the summer, with their long-standing interest in Carlos Baleba finally paying off.

Ornstein later reported that a Deadline Day loan move for Manchester City’s Rayan Aït-Nouri was considered, but United were not willing to accept the obligation-to-buy clause City wanted. A loan for Barcelona’s Alejandro Balde also came under review, yet Barcelona were only open to an outright sale. By the time the window closed, the left-back issue remained untouched.

That outcome was not without context. Midfield reconstruction had become the main target after Casemiro departed, while Manuel Ugarte would likely have followed if not for the ACL injury he suffered at the World Cup. With Kobbie Mainoo and Bruno Fernandes potentially the only senior midfield options, recruitment in that area was treated as essential, particularly with Champions League football returning and the schedule becoming more demanding.

Advertisement

The midfield rebuild still brought setbacks. A move for Atalanta’s Éderson fell through late on, and United also missed out on Matheus Fernandes and Elliot Anderson, both of whom joined other big Premier League clubs. Even so, the club redirected its resources and spent in the region of $200 million to bring in Santos from Chelsea, Tielemans from Aston Villa and Baleba from Brighton & Hove Albion.

Less than 10 games into the campaign, the lack of depth at left back is already obvious. Luke Shaw has missed United’s last two matches, Patrick Dorgu has been used there despite being signed as a winger last season, Harry Amas has already been introduced in the role, and Ornstein has also suggested Noussair Mazraoui as another option.

Continue Reading

Man Utd

Opta forecast shows costly consequences after United’s derby setback

Opta’s latest projection leaves United sixth after a disputed derby defeat and a costly early setback.

Published

on

Michael Carrick was furious after Manchester United’s disputed 1-0 loss to Manchester City, and the wider picture may be just as damaging as the result itself. Although the season is still in its early stages, the defeat has already been framed as one that could shape the months ahead.

Soon after the final whistle, Pro Ref, the organisation previously known as PGMOL, accepted that the decision was wrong and sent United a formal apology. Carrick made his view clear afterwards, saying: “The explanation I got was he [Fernández] wasn’t interfering with play, so I just don’t get it,” Carrick, said after the game. “I can’t understand how they’re trying to help referees by putting so many layers behind them, with so many people, so many bodies, so many screens and so many offices to try to come up with the right decisions.

“If that’s how the rules are interpreted, that you’re not interfering with play when you’ve thrown yourself at the ball six yards from goal and pretty much nearly touched it, then I don’t know. On top of that, even the line they drew was a bit dubious.

“It’s worrying if that’s really how the game’s seen by those who are officiating it. I don’t know where you go. I don’t really know how you go and get another explanation on that one.”

Advertisement

With only four matches played, 102 points remain on offer, but Opta’s supercomputer has still produced a table that offers little comfort for United supporters. The projection has them finishing sixth, outside the Champions League places.

That would leave United just one point behind Brighton & Hove Albion in fifth, a gap made harder to accept given the match itself. A goalless draw was the sense of the occasion, and United may even have felt they could take all three points once City were reduced to 10 men after Phil Foden’s early red card. Those extra points would have lifted them above Chelsea into fourth in Opta’s predicted standings.

The projected table is tight, with fewer than three points separating fourth and sixth. That narrow margin underlines why the outcome is so significant, because sixth place would also mean a major financial setback and, in turn, a blow to recruitment, wages and the ability to match rivals higher up the table.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Man City

Haaland decides derby as United waste the advantage of City’s red card

Haaland settled a derby City finished with 10 men, while United failed to make their advantage count.

Published

on

Manchester United left Old Trafford with a result that felt more painful because of the circumstances, as Erling Haaland’s lone goal handed Manchester City a 1-0 win in a derby shaped by Phil Foden’s dismissal. City spent most of the match with 10 men, yet still found a way to take control of the contest after the red card changed the rhythm of the afternoon.

Foden’s intervention should have tilted the balance toward United, especially after the hosts had been growing into the game. Instead, the incident altered the structure in City’s favour. With Elliot Anderson isolated at the base of a 4-1-4-1, United initially caused problems by drawing him into awkward decisions, particularly as Matheus Cunha kept dropping from the forward line. But once City reshaped into a compact 4-4-1, they became harder to break down and gave Anderson far more protection.

That left United searching for solutions they did not find. More than 40 minutes passed after Foden’s dismissal before Gianluigi Donnarumma was forced into a save, and the best opening of the closing stages was wasted by Bryan Mbeumo at stoppage time. The broader picture was stark: a team with the numerical advantage failed to turn it into control, while the side with 10 men grew more organised and disciplined.

There were solid individual displays in the United side, with Kobbie Mainoo standing out in midfield and several defenders coping reasonably well. For City, Donnarumma produced the decisive intervention when required, Matheus Nunes came through a physical duel on the right, and Haaland again showed his reliability in the key moment. His finish, awkward as it looked, was enough to settle a match that United failed to manage after the sending-off.

Advertisement

The numbers reflected the frustration for the hosts. United had 55 percent possession and 16 shots, but City created the cleaner openings and made theirs count. In a derby of fine margins, the team with the red card left with the points.

Continue Reading

Trending