Manchester City
Rui Pinto renews criticism of Gianni Infantino over Manchester City case
Pinto has renewed his attack on Infantino, linking the FIFA president to City and PSG sanctions.
Rui Pinto has again placed FIFA President Gianni Infantino under intense scrutiny, reviving accusations tied to the long-running Manchester City case and accusing him of shielding the club from harsher punishment.
The Portuguese hacker, whose leaked material helped trigger the Premier League investigation into Manchester City, described Infantino as “a cancer on football.” In a social media post, Pinto argued that Infantino was already aware of the issues around the club in 2014, when he was UEFA General Secretary.
“Back in 2014, there was a man who was already aware of the irregularities involving Manchester City,” the activist wrote on social media . “That man now runs FIFA.
“The infamous Gianni Infantino, then UEFA General Secretary, abused his authority, shared confidential documents and, in short, outmaneuvered the Investigatory Chamber, doing everything in his power to ensure that both Manchester City and PSG would merely receive a fine, avoiding a deeper investigation that could have led to a Champions League ban. All of these details were also revealed through Football Leaks.
“Given his actions as UEFA General Secretary and, more recently, as FIFA President, I can only say, in my humble opinion, that Gianni Infantino has become a cancer on football and should have no place in the future of the game.”
The comments revisit UEFA’s 2014 examination of Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain, when both clubs avoided competition bans and were instead fined. Pinto and Der Spiegel later claimed that Infantino “circumvented” normal procedure and helped steer the matter toward that outcome.
Among the documents cited in the report was an email allegedly sent by Infantino to Khaldoon Al Mubarak in May 2014. It included the line: “Sorry for my ‘late-Friday-night email,’” along with the phrase, “You know you can trust me. … Let’s be positive!”
Der Spiegel also reported that UEFA’s Investigatory Chamber found City had accumulated a deficit of at least €188 million during a period when only €45 million could be lost. The same report said Infantino had held “secret talks, even supplying them with confidential materials” and made “compromises that he was unauthorized to propose.”
City’s dissatisfaction was also highlighted through a hacked email allegedly written by Simon Cliff, in which Al Mubarak was quoted as saying: “Khaldoon said he would rather spend 30 million on the 50 best lawyers in the world to sue them for the next 10 years.”
Infantino has not responded publicly while touring Asian soccer associations.
Manchester City
Scholes Rejects Rooney’s View On A Possible Title Reallocation
Scholes and Rooney disagree on a retroactive title, with City’s appeal keeping the issue unresolved.
Paul Scholes has taken a sharply different line from Wayne Rooney over the idea of a retrospective Premier League title being handed out if Manchester City are punished over financial breaches. The former Manchester United midfielder made clear that he would not turn down a medal, even if the circumstances were far from ideal.
City have been found to have misreported revenues by more than $1.2 billion (£900 million) over the nine seasons from 2009-10 to 2017-18. Within that stretch, the club collected three league crowns, including the 2011-12 title that was secured on the final kick of the season and denied to a Manchester United side featuring both Rooney and Scholes.
Rooney has already said he “wouldn’t feel comfortable” accepting a medal for that campaign. He also argued, “I don’t think we deserve it. We didn’t do enough that season to win the league,” setting out why he would not want the title awarded after the fact.
Scholes responded with a much firmer position on social media. “Keep hearing ex-teammates saying they want trophies taking off them but they don’t want their medals…” Scholes wrote on social media, “f— that I’m a greedy b—— I want my medal.”
The debate comes against the backdrop of City’s guilty verdict, which remains subject to appeal. The finding was made by an independent judicial commission after two years of deliberation, and the club have said they will explore “all other legal avenues” available, including a further challenge to the Premier League or even involving the High Court of England and Wales.
For now, any possible sanction is still unresolved. But if the Premier League eventually moves to strip titles, the competition would have the authority to do so, including the possibility of redistributing medals. Even so, the first reaction reported was that clubs had “little appetite” for titles being removed, let alone reassigned, given the scale of time covered by the investigation.
Manchester City
Tuchel says Manchester City verdict has become an England talking point
Tuchel says Manchester City’s guilty verdict is being discussed in England camp during the break.
Thomas Tuchel has acknowledged that the guilty verdict against Manchester City has spilled into England camp discussions during the international break.
The England manager said the situation is being talked about openly among his players, with uncertainty over possible punishments continuing to hang over the club. A range of sanctions has been suggested, some of which could have serious consequences for the team and the players who represent it.
Tuchel said the matter has naturally entered everyday conversation around the squad. “I think it is a distraction,” said Tuchel, whose England roster includes Marc Guéhi and Elliot Anderson after left back Nico O’Reilly withdrew from injury. “It is. Let’s say it is a subject. If it’s a distraction, I don’t know.
“It is of course a topic and we speak about it at dinner and at a table of eight or 12 people. We speak about it at breakfast. I know the Man City players get a lot of messages and phone calls and feedback about it.
“Are they worried or concerned? I think that would be a very human reaction if you don’t know what’s going on for the club that you signed. They’re still young. They’re ambitious. They’re told they are totally innocent and don’t know what’s going on. It is a subject.
“I am again not sure if it’s a distraction. I don’t see it when I see them in my meetings. I don’t see it how they behave with other teammates, and I don’t see it in training being a distraction. But it’s a topic. How can’t it be?”
City have appealed the verdict and continue to insist on their innocence. No timetable has been set for any punishment, and the next legal stage with the Premier League may yet shape what happens.
While the players themselves would not be directly punished, the wider effect could be significant. Expulsion from the Premier League would leave them in limbo, while a points deduction or relegation could alter both earnings and future careers.
The issue is also being discussed beyond England. Players are away with Argentina, France and Uzbekistan, while Wales midfielder Ethan Ampadu, of Leeds United, said the subject has reached that camp too. “Everyone has talked about it,” Ampadu said.
Manchester City
Cavan Sullivan’s Manchester City move remains on course despite verdict fallout
Cavan Sullivan’s move to Manchester City stays on track despite the club’s financial verdict and appeal.
Cavan Sullivan’s route to Manchester City remains in place, even as the club’s financial case continues to cast a shadow over the future.
Two years ago, the 14-year-old committed his future to City when he came of age. That plan now sits against the backdrop of a major ruling against the club, who were found guilty of 114 of 115 charges related to breaches of Premier League financial regulations. The case centred on allegations that City used “sham” contracts and agreements to boost revenue and cut costs by £900 million ($1.2 billion) across the 2009-10 to 2017-18 seasons.
City are appealing, and the process has already stretched into a three-year saga. The possible sanctions remain significant, with anything from a transfer ban to relegation still mentioned as possibilities if the club cannot overturn the verdict.
Much of the attention has understandably focused on the impact for established names, but Sullivan is also part of the wider picture. His path to the Premier League may have become more complicated, yet his destination has not changed. The Athletic report that the Philadelphia-native is still expected to make Etihad Stadium his new home in January 2028.
For now, “nothing has changed” for Sullivan, whose contract remains “intact.” The next stage of his career is still mapped out as it was in 2024. Sullivan has not commented on the situation, according to sources at the Philadelphia Union.
All signs point to a farewell to his boyhood club and a move to Manchester in 15 months, though the exact circumstances remain uncertain. If City’s appeal takes as long as the original investigation, Sullivan could arrive before any punishment affects the club’s standing. A heavier points deduction or expulsion before then would alter the outlook, but that remains impossible to call at this stage.
His stock continues to rise. Sullivan was named MLS Player of the Month for September 2026, becoming the youngest player ever to win the award, after delivering a league-high nine goal contributions that month. A senior call-up for the U.S. men’s national team added further momentum, with Sullivan making his debut in a 4-1 win over Peru before coming off the bench in the 4-2 win over Chile.
