Connect with us

Chelsea

Maresca rejects Manchester City links and reaffirms commitment to Chelsea

Maresca dismissed Manchester City speculation reaffirmed Chelsea commitment and contract until 2029.

Published

on

Enzo Maresca moved to close down speculation about a move to Manchester City, stressing that his attention remains with Chelsea and the immediate challenges the team faces.

Asked directly about reports linking him to Pep Guardiola’s former post, Maresca was dismissive. “It doesn’t affect me at all because I know that is 100% speculation,” he stressed. “And in this moment, there is no time for these kind of things.

“First of all, because I have a contract here until 2029 probably. And my focus, I said many times, is just about this club and I’m very proud to be here. But again, it’s speculation. One week ago I was in Italy, the same with Juventus. So I don’t pay attention because I know that is not true.

“Again, I think it’s just a speculation. Now, it’s important to understand the reason why this news was there. But it’s not my job, I don’t care at all. But again, it’s just a speculation. And I think the players, they are focused on a Newcastle game that is a very important game and very difficult.”

Advertisement

When pressed on whether he will still be in charge next season, Maresca gave a concise reply: “Absolutely, yes,” he promised.

He reiterated contractual security and concentration on his role. “Again, I have a contract until 2029, and this is speculation, 100%. So I don’t have nothing to add, because again, I don’t pay attention. And if we continue to talk about that, that means that I’m paying attention to that. But I’m not focused on that. I’m just focused on the Newcastle game. I’m focused on my job.

“Again, I signed a contract last year until 2029. I’m happy with that, and no more than that.”

The interview also touched on Maresca’s relationship with those above him. He acknowledged ongoing communication but said they had not discussed his earlier, sharper remarks. “We are in the same building, so we speak about different things,” he explained. “But about the Everton press conference, no.

Advertisement

“Absolutely [the relationship is fine].”

Maresca closed by asking supporters to maintain their backing after the crowd sang his name following the 3–1 win over Cardiff City. “Just to continue to support the team in the way they have done since I joined the club and also in the past,” he said. “And trust the process from the team, from the club, from everyone.”

Chelsea

Six Chelsea Players the Club Should Move On From This Summer

Chelsea’s 2025-26 season has been defined by apathy and protests; six players should be sold. Summer

Published

on

Chelsea’s 2025-26 campaign has been defined by apathy and renewed protests, with BlueCo’s ownership the focus of fan ire and co-owner Behdad Eghbali admitting a change of strategy could be in order. Supporters are tired of drift and, regardless of the route the club takes next, there are several squad figures who no longer look part of Chelsea’s long-term plan.

Robert Sánchez has delivered moments of quality, including in the FA Cup semifinal victory over Leeds United, and has produced runs of form that convinced some he might be the long-term option. Statistically he has had a fine Premier League season. However, unforced errors and lapses in possession persist and the article argues he remains upgradeable. “If Mike Maignan is on the table again, you go and get him. There’s no point keeping your current No. 1 around in that event. That’s avoidable tension.” He is probably a Premier League starter elsewhere, but Chelsea have loftier ambitions.

Wesley Fofana was signed for as much as $95 million (£70 million) in 2022 but has yet to justify that fee. Injuries have disrupted his time in west London and, even fit for much of 2025-26, he has struggled with discipline. Trevoh Chalobah has outperformed him and could be Levi Colwill’s partner for 2026–27. Chelsea should consider offers before contract conversations become awkward.

Benoît Badiashile has seldom been a regular starter. The ex-Monaco centre back failed to earn Enzo Maresca’s trust and much of his action was limited to the Conference League last season. A brief upsurge under Liam Rosenior fizzled out and, at 25, he faces a crossroads.

Advertisement

Among the wide players, Pedro Neto offered energy and impressed in the FA Cup but remains part of a collection of wingers described as largely mediocre. Alejandro Garnacho, signed last summer for $54 million (£40 million) on a seven-year deal, has 12 goal contributions this season but has not evolved consistently since his breakthrough and can be frustrating outside transition moments.

Marc Guiu, still only 20, was recalled from a planned 2025–26 loan to Sunderland and has operated as a third-choice centre forward at Stamford Bridge after Chelsea took a flyer on him in 2024. He has produced very little of note and would likely benefit from a fresh start elsewhere.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Why Calvert-Lewin Was Cleared After a Hair-contact Review and Why Martínez’s Appeal Failed

Calvert-Lewin cleared after VAR review for contact on Cucurella; Martínez appeal was rejected. Read.

Published

on

Dominic Calvert-Lewin faced no sanction after an apparent hair contact on Chelsea defender Marc Cucurella during the FA Cup semifinal at Wembley. The incident, which occurred midway through the first half, showed downward contact from Calvert-Lewin’s hand to Cucurella’s long, curly hair. Cucurella immediately grabbed the back of his head.

Referee Jarred Gillett did not issue a decision at the time and the match was paused for VAR official Paul Howard to check the footage. Calvert-Lewin was cleared after the review. TNT Sports commentator Darren Fletcher, who had real-time access to the VAR process and conversation, relayed that the contact was from “the flat of the hand” rather than a clenched fist.

The episode invited comparison with an earlier case involving Lisandro Martínez. Only two days before the Chelsea–Leeds semi, a regulatory commission acting for the FA published written reasons for denying Martínez’s appeal against a red card and three-match ban. Interim Manchester United manager Michael Carrick called that decision at the time “one of the worst” he’s ever seen. The club had lodged an appeal arguing that Martínez was the victim of wrongful dismissal and that the ban was “excessive.”

The commission rejected the appeal. It said it did not feel “with any confidence” that the “force exerted” by Martínez on Calvert-Lewin’s hair/scalp was “negligible.” The panel took into account Calvert-Lewin’s reaction, which it said “suggested that he had felt a certain amount of force exerted upon his hair/scalp.” On that basis the commission concluded the VAR interpretation of the Martínez incident was “reasonable” and therefore not an “obvious error.” The match-day announcement that followed the Martínez review had been: “After review, Manchester United 6 is guilty of pulling his hair – violent conduct. Final decision is red card.”

Advertisement

The contrasting outcomes have left Manchester United fans unsettled and prompted wider questions about consistency in officiating in England. The draft also notes that a clear hair pull from Fulham’s Kenny Tete on Manchester City’s Antoine Semenyo in February went unpunished.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Chelsea under BlueCo: ranking the five managers who served more than 10 games

BlueCo era at Chelsea ranked: five managers with more than 10 games, judged by record. Full breakdown

Published

on

The BlueCo period at Chelsea has been defined by instability in the dugout and the steady turnover of managers. With Liam Rosenior the latest to lose the job, the club will begin 2026–27 with a sixth permanent manager under BlueCo. Below are the five bosses who managed more than 10 matches in that era, assessed on results and the lasting imprint of their tenures.

Frank Lampard (Games Managed: 11 | Winning Percentage: 9.1% | Trophies Won: 0)
Frank Lampard’s second spell as caretaker in 2022–23 stands in stark contrast to his earlier success. He had “overcoming a transfer ban to lead the Blues to the Champions League in 2019–20,” but his interim run in April produced Chelsea’s worst recent form. Lampard became the first and only manager in Chelsea’s history to lose the opening four games of his tenure. A 3–1 win against Bournemouth was the lone victory of his caretaker spell and the campaign finished with Chelsea 12th in the Premier League, their lowest top-flight finish since 1994.

Liam Rosenior (Games Managed: 23 | Winning Percentage: 47.8% | Trophies Won: 0)
Rosenior’s period began promisingly, with four consecutive Premier League wins and two Champions League victories that helped Chelsea qualify among the top eight in the group stage. The form collapsed thereafter: apart from FA Cup ties against lower-league opponents, Chelsea won just one of their last 11 matches under Rosenior. The team failed to score against a top-flight opponent in each of their last six games with him in charge. After Enzo Fernández scored a momentary equalizer in the first leg of the Champions League quarterfinals against Paris Saint-Germain, Chelsea were outscored 17–0 by top-flight rivals until Rosenior’s sacking.

Graham Potter (Games Managed: 31 | Winning Percentage: 38.7% | Trophies Won: 0)
Potter, the first permanent BlueCo appointment, was unable to steady the side after Thomas Tuchel’s departure. Chelsea won seven of the 22 Premier League matches Potter oversaw and he left with a joint-lowest points-per-game record for managers with more than 20 league matches at 1.27, tied with Glenn Hoddle. After winning just four matches after the calendar turned to 2023, Potter was dismissed in early April while the club endured its most difficult season of the 21st century. He did reach the Champions League quarterfinals during his tenure.

Advertisement

Taken together, the five tenures reveal a period of repeated disruption and mixed short-term flashes amid extended poor runs of form.

Continue Reading

Trending