Connect with us

Everton

Slot rejects timewasting allegation after Merseyside derby

Arne Slot rejected timewasting claims after Everton’s 58th-minute goal and Grealish’s comments. 2025

Published

on

Liverpool manager Arne Slot dismissed suggestions from Everton forward Jack Grealish that the visitors were justified in accusing the Reds of timewasting during last weekend’s Merseyside derby.

Slot acknowledged the game was physically demanding. “The second half was more difficult because of Everton of course, but also because we ran a bit out of energy.” The contest swung in Everton’s favour when Grealish delivered a high cross to the back post and Iliman Ndiaye brought it down for Idrissa Gueye to blast beyond Alisson in the 58th minute, halving the deficit and raising tension at Anfield.

Everton were left frustrated by several refereeing decisions, with Grealish openly questioning the officiating. “The stoppage time, three minutes and one minute—I’ve never seen that in the Premier League in the last two or three years,” he lamented, insisting that Liverpool “were obviously trying to slow the game down.” He also highlighted a booking for Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall and the amount of added time as key grievances.

Slot answered those claims directly on Monday, arguing the added time was appropriate and that suggestions of deliberate delay were misplaced. “A lot has been said about the added time against Everton but I would have loved to play 34 seconds more because we were in a five-v-two situation at that moment,” he said.

Advertisement

He expanded on the point in a longer response, outlining his view of Liverpool’s intent. “Now that tells you, I think, all about the mentality we have, always wanting to score a goal. The three minutes were completely correct because there were only three moments where a substitution was made.

“There was no timewasting because that’s not what we do and there was no treatment of injuries, one goal scored. Then you come to three [minutes]. Where in many other games when we need a goal, there’s a lot, a lot, a lot of timewasting going on, I can tell you.”

The exchange underlined the intensity of the derby and the contrasting perspectives from both camps after a pivotal 58th-minute strike altered the course of the match.

Advertisement

Arsenal

Eight Premier League Grounds That Define Matchday Atmosphere

Eight Premier League stadiums examined: Elland Road, Stamford Bridge, Stadium of Light and more. Fan

Published

on

The Premier League offers a wide variety of stadium experiences. Each venue in this selection delivers a distinct blend of history, design and fan culture.

Elland Road (capacity: 37,890) still feels like a fortress. Its traditional, non-bowl design keeps stands tight to the pitch and produces an intense, in-your-face atmosphere. Leeds United have played there since the club’s formation in 1919. The concourses may feel a little outdated, but that only adds to the ground’s character and makes it an intimidating place to visit.

Stamford Bridge (capacity: 41,631) is modest in scale for Chelsea, a club described in the source as two-time European champions and five-time Premier League winners. The stadium’s steep, enclosed stands trap sound and, when it is rocking, create a cauldron of noise. The stadium can feel claustrophobic, and the rhythmic clatter of fans banging metal in the stands after a goal contributes to its raw edge.

The Stadium of Light (capacity: 48,707) is a relatively modern ground, Sunderland’s home since 1997. It balances spaciousness with intimacy: wide concourses, tidy seating and excellent sightlines make for a smooth matchday. A lively fan zone and potential for future expansion underline its long-term credentials.

Advertisement

Craven Cottage (capacity: 29,589) is smaller but exceptionally charming. Perched on the banks of the Thames and surrounded by pubs and bars, it features the 1905 red-brick pavilion alongside modern upgrades and a new stand, blending tradition and contemporary comfort.

Villa Park (capacity: 42,918) often feels larger than its capacity suggests. The Holt End, with its depth and proximity to the pitch, and steep stands create constant intensity. Strong views and an old-school feel contribute to a consistently good matchday.

Old Trafford (capacity: 74,879) shows its age: leaking roof, worn structure and a confusing internal layout. Yet the stadium retains an intangible aura rooted in decades of history and memorable moments.

Everton’s new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock (capacity: 52,769) opened as a modern waterfront venue after Everton fans said goodbye to Goodison Park at the end of the 2024–25 season. It offers a wide range of social spaces, self-service “eBars,” premium dining, and some areas with cinema-style chairs and private screens.

Advertisement

St. James’ Park (capacity: 52,258) is a towering stadium whose steep stands produce an intense, close-to-action feel. High home sections and a dominant presence on the skyline combine to create a dramatic matchday setting.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Everton Weighs Legal Action over Premier League Ruling on Chelsea

Everton considers legal action after Premier League’s punishment of Chelsea drew anger and dismay. .

Published

on

Everton are reportedly preparing to challenge the Premier League after Chelsea received a reduced punishment for breaches of the division’s financial rules. Chelsea were handed a suspended one-year ban on the purchase of senior players and a nine-month academy transfer ban for unrelated matters. Both the fine and the suspended ban were smaller than the league’s usual sanctions.

Everton, who were docked eight points during the 2023–24 Premier League season for two separate profit and sustainability breaches, have reacted with “anger and dismay.” The Guardian claim that Everton are planning to write to Richard Masters asking for a clearer explanation of the reasoning and that a “legal challenge” is under consideration. Nottingham Forest, who were docked four points in the same season, are also thought to be in contact with Everton about the situation.

Chelsea were found to have made illicit payments exclusively under Roman Abramovich’s ownership. Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital discovered those irregularities while conducting due diligence ahead of their 2022 purchase and deliberately set aside around $200 million to meet any potential penalties. The size of that provision suggests the club expected a heavier sanction than the one imposed. A separate investigation by the Football Association remains ongoing.

Although Chelsea would not be the direct defendant in any case, the club could still face consequences if the Premier League is judged to have applied its rules inconsistently. Everton manager David Moyes spoke for the club when he criticised the explanation offered so far. “I don’t think they have explained it well enough in the reasoning what the fine was and why it was,” he said. “I think they have to explain exactly what has happened here. If they don’t then we are never going to understand their reasoning why.

Advertisement

“This is me not being anything against Chelsea, absolutely not, I’m just saying that everybody would like to know; Everton supporters, for the pain they had to go through when they had a huge points deduction, and other clubs as well.

“Those points deductions may well have been correct, I don’t know, but we need to see what is the difference? What would you rather have, a £10 million fine or a 10-point deduction? The money you get for your league place now, that might cover it. It would be good if we could get more of an explanation. How much is the £10 million fine having an effect, really?”

The Premier League issued limited published reasoning and cited two core reasons for deciding a sporting sanction was not appropriate.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arsenal

From £75-a-week to millions: Rooney’s scholar pay compared with Max Dowman

Rooney earned the equivalent of $100 weekly as a scholar; Max Dowman can earn $465.60 now per rules.

Published

on

Wayne Rooney’s early earnings as a scholar remain a striking reminder of how quickly a football career can change financially. Rooney has revealed he was receiving the equivalent of just $100 each week when he scored the famous goal against Arsenal in 2002. That payment came while he was still a scholar, four days shy of his 17th birthday.

The landscape for under-17 players is defined by rules that keep them on scholar terms until they are eligible to sign professional contracts. The recent emergence of Max Dowman, who scored for Arsenal against Everton 73 days after his 16th birthday, has brought those scholar payments back into focus. Dowman can earn up to $465.60 per week under current terms, an annual figure of $24,211.

Rooney recalled the difference between those scholar payments and professional wages on his BBC podcast. “When I scored against Arsenal, I think I was on £75 ($100)-a-week,” he said. “But then that was four days before my 17th birthday, so I was still a scholar [for the Arsenal game]. I used to borrow money off my mum and dad until I signed my pro contract.” The transition at 17 is decisive: a contemporary newspaper report noted that, upon signing his first professional contract, Rooney jumped to a weekly salary of $17,293 (at today’s rate), an amount that worked out at almost $900,000 a year.

The progression continued rapidly. By the time Rooney left Everton and joined Manchester United aged 18, he was being paid not far short of $3.5 million per season. Those figures underline the contrast between scholar allowances and professional terms, and they also reflect Rooney’s own modest upbringing. He admitted he used to exaggerate travel distances when reporting for England’s national youth teams. “I used to find the furthest place away and say that’s where we drove in from,” he laughed.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending