Liverpool
Slot: Squad Quality Intact but Injuries Have Forced Selections
Slot: squad is sufficient; injuries have reduced availability and fuelled Liverpool’s slide. and more
Arne Slot has been clear: he does not view Liverpool’s options as deficient. His recent public criticism was aimed at availability issues rather than a lack of quality after what the club spent in the summer transfer window to bolster a title-winning squad.
Slot pushed back against suggestions he doubted the squad, instead pointing to injuries and disrupted pre-season preparation as the root cause of the current difficulties that have seen Liverpool drop from first to seventh in a matter of weeks.
“We miss nothing,” he began. “I am happy that you asked this question because I am completely happy with the team and with all the quality that we have and I am also completely convinced by the strategy and the policy that we have but that makes the issue—if you call it an issue—is not all of them have had a proper pre-season or have been injured.
Slot explained how absences reduce the effective squad size and force the same players into heavier workloads. “When three or four are injured you go back to 16 players. I am a firm believer that 20 or 21 player is enough but you have to keep them fit as we did last season. We are struggling a bit more to keep them fit, in my opinion, for obvious reasons.
He used individuals to underline the point: “Alex [Isak] is a great example of this. A few others have missed out on pre-season or had injuries during pre-season. It has been more difficult than last season to keep them all available and then if a few of them are not available, it comes down a lot to the same players. Maybe last season we were more lucky and now we are more unlucky.”
The manager was adamant that injury problems should not be an excuse for poor results. “No excuses for our results before people say this,” he clarified. “It is nothing to do with the squad depth, it is how we’ve gone throughout the season in terms of injuries and availability.”
Slot acknowledged he must sometimes take risks to build match fitness, citing his decision-making over player minutes. “Let me use Alex as an example,” he continued. “He had to do a pre-season inside the season and then people will argue, ‘Why do you play him?’ But if I don’t play him, I don’t have him available and we need to have him available or then we have to play Hugo [Ekitiké] every single game.
He also referenced workload comparisons and named players who have been in and out with injuries: “I was with Owen Hargreaves when he made the comparison between the two of them and he showed that one played 34 games last season and the other played 34 and we play 60 over here. That is why I need to get Alex as soon as I can into playing as many games as he can. That has been something not only with him but with a few others as well.
“Jeremie Frimpong has been in and out with injuries quite a few times, same with Conor Bradley so if one is out the other has to play more and that is why I’ve had to play Dominik Szoboszlai a few times in that position.
“That has been something what every team has, so it is not an excuse, but what was a bit different than last season. Last season, they all had one year Premier League experience as a minimum, they were all fit when we started and they stayed fit. Now, they weren’t all fit from the start and some players have to play more than you want them to do and that is a risk of them getting injured as well.
“That is just the situation as it is and we have more than enough good players available to play the game on Saturday, Tuesday and Sunday but I have to take care of them and that’s why I made the decision to not play some a few days ago.”
Liverpool
Liverpool at a Crossroads: Slot’s Short-Term Future Hinges on Champions League Result
Slot’s future at Liverpool hinges on Wednesday’s Champions League tie as criticism and doubts grow..
A run of unsettling reports has placed intense scrutiny on Arne Slot’s position at Liverpool, with Wednesday’s Champions League last-16 second leg against Galatasaray framed as a potential turning point. The Reds travel to the tie trailing 1–0 on aggregate and return to Anfield needing to overturn that deficit.
The line of argument running through recent coverage assumes Slot holds the same reservoir of goodwill at the club as his predecessor. While both men share the same tally of Premier League titles, the German’s teams were celebrated as much for their high-energy style as their trophies. Slot himself has conceded this iteration of the team are “boring.” Supporters made their displeasure heard with boos after Sunday’s 1–1 draw with relegation-battling Tottenham Hotspur.
At present Slot is not thought to be in immediate danger of being sacked. Still, The Athletic’s James Pearce warned he must “turn this around” and that “the clocking is ticking” on finding a solution. Those alarm bells could start ringing as soon as Wednesday night.
Liverpool created a notable number of chances in Istanbul, a fact that offers hope of a comeback, but chronic defensive problems continue to compromise any sense of security at the back. Slot reportedly retains the faith of the club hierarchy, yet The Athletic’s Simon Hughes warned “it will be really, really hard for Slot to rescue back that trust” should Liverpool again exit in the round of 16.
Slot’s appointment as Liverpool’s “head coach” in the summer of 2024 coincided with the arrival of Richard Hughes as sporting director. The pair presided over the largest single-window spend by any club last summer. Hughes has been linked with a role at Al Hilal, according to The Telegraph, though no official contact is thought to have been made. Both Slot and Hughes have contracts running until 2027.
The potential loss of a close ally would only weaken Slot’s standing. Meanwhile former players continue to offer forthright assessments; Jamie Carragher labelled Liverpool a “team of individuals” after the Spurs draw. The Dutch coach has offered a different view, but the coming week will be decisive for perceptions of his stewardship.
Arsenal
Money Talks: CIES Ranks the World’s Most Valuable Squads
CIES values nine squads over $1bn; Real Madrid leads at $1.78bn while Tottenham exceed $1bn. Values.
The surge in transfer prices and squad valuations has reshaped how clubs are measured. The CIES Football Observatory produces those estimates by weighing a player’s quality, age, position and length of contract, and those individual valuations are then summed to give each squad a market value.
The scale is striking. There are nine clubs with squads valued above $1 billion. At the top is Real Madrid with a squad valuation of $1.78 billion and Kylian Mbappé listed as the most valuable player at $221 million. Barcelona follow with $1.60 billion, Lamine Yamal accounting for $403.9 million of that total. Arsenal and Paris Saint-Germain each sit at $1.55 billion, with Bukayo Saka ($131.5 million) and Désiré Doué ($150.3 million) named as their most valuable players respectively.
Liverpool’s roster is valued at $1.20 billion, most valuable player Florian Wirtz ($149.8 million). Bayern Munich come in at $1.15 billion with Michael Olise ($162.6 million) as their top-rated asset. Tottenham’s squad is valued at $1.03 billion; Xavi Simons is listed as their most valuable player ($98.1 million), despite the club’s current relegation fight and Igor Tudor’s assessment that players “are lacking when we attack, we lack the quality to score the goal. We are lacking in the middle to run and we are lacking behind to stay there to suffer and not concede the goal.”
The list also includes Manchester United ($953 million, Benjamin Šeško $100.3 million) and Inter ($942 million, Lautaro Martínez $117 million). Earlier-positioned squads under $1 billion include Atlético Madrid ($903 million, Julián Álvarez $136.5 million), Juventus ($896 million, Kenan Yıldız $152.5 million) and Brighton ($894 million, Diego Gómez $86.4 million).
Several voices in the game have reflected on the market changes. Karl-Heinz Rumminegge said, “There are some players who do not come with a price tag.” Robert Lewandowski complained, “You are young, you score 10 goals in six months and some club will pay 60 or 70 million,” adding, “Before, you had to achieve something.” Vincent Kompany warned players about hype: “I always tell my players, ‘When there’s hype please don’t believe it, you’re not that good.’”
Whether the valuations mirror on-field quality or the inflation of a transfer market remains the central question CIES data brings into focus.
Analytics & Stats
Szoboszlai’s Conference League Comment Underlines Liverpool’s Finishing and Late-Goal Problems
Szoboszlai warned Liverpool must wake up; finishing inefficiency and late concessions persist. Today
Dominik Szoboszlai opened the scoring with his fourth Premier League free kick of the season, the most any Liverpool player has ever amassed in the competition’s history, but the lead did not hold. Richarlison salvaged a 90th-minute equaliser as Liverpool again dropped points late.
“I feel flat,” Szoboszlai told Sky Sports, barely raising his voice above a whisper. “We have to wake up because if we carry on like this, we should be happy with the Conference League.” Asked for an explanation behind this painfully familiar collapse — it was the eighth goal Liverpool have conceded in the 90th minute or later this season — Szoboszlai delivered a concerning response: “I don’t know why this is happening, I honestly don’t know.
“I think in the first half we played very well, we controlled the whole game and they hardly created chances apart from one or two headers. Second half we just didn’t so the same things.”
There was a clear sense of complacency after the opener: between that free kick and Richarlison’s equaliser, Tottenham registered twice as many shots on target as their hosts (six to three). Manager Arne Slot was less focused on attitude and more on finishing. “I think we are completely underperforming in terms of the chances we create and the amount of goals we score,” he said. “That’s quite a surprise if you look at how much attacking quality we have.”
Slot added: “If you’re not able to score enough, then you have to be able to keep a clean sheet, and that’s something we find really hard this season.”
The numbers underline the problem. “Liverpool have racked up 49 Premier League goals this season from an expected goals (xG) of 50.0, per FotMob.” That one-goal difference which Slot has bemoaned is almost exactly the Premier League average. Ten teams have a larger negative differential between their xG and actual goals scored, while nine different sides have been more efficient than Liverpool this season. Liverpool scored 86 goals from an xG of 83.5 last term, and nine clubs out-performed their predicted goal tally by a larger margin than the Reds.
Opta define a “big chance” as “a situation where a player is reasonably expected to score” and it is these opportunities Liverpool have frequently squandered. The side have converted 32% of their “big chances” this season—only three clubs have a lower rate. Big chances created fell from 150 (1st) in 2024–25 to 81 (6th) this season, while big chances missed moved from 92 (1st) to 55 (4th).
