Chelsea
Chelsea face fresh fitness worry after Enzo Fernández pulled from Argentina squad
Enzo Fernández withdrew from Argentina with knee inflammation and will return to west London early.
Chelsea have received a further fitness setback after Enzo Fernández withdrew from the Argentina squad with a knee problem.
Fernández played 78 minutes in Argentina’s victory over Venezuela, a game in which he recorded more touches and passes than any other player on the pitch. Argentina’s official X account announced on Saturday that he had been withdrawn from the squad because of an inflammation of the knee, adding his name to Chelsea’s growing list of absentees.
The midfielder was already expected to miss Argentina’s second friendly with Puerto Rico, with BBC Sport’s Nizaar Kinsella reporting that he would not play in that match. Given that information, an early return to west London for further assessment and treatment makes practical sense.
Chelsea had entered the international break dealing with multiple fitness concerns. The squad for the club’s last-gasp win over Liverpool had been weakened by absences that included Levi Colwill, Wesley Fofana, Cole Palmer and Liam Delap. In the same victory, Josh Acheampong and Benoît Badiashile also suffered fitness problems.
Head coach Enzo Maresca will now be monitoring Fernández’s situation closely ahead of the club’s return to Premier League action. Chelsea travel to Nottingham Forest next in the league, and the manager will be hoping that the knee inflammation is not a significant issue after what has already been a week of unwelcome injury news.
For now the club must wait for assessments following Fernández’s return, with the immediate priority likely to be reducing inflammation and evaluating how soon the midfielder can rejoin team training without risk of further setback.
Carabao Cup
Pochettino: Chelsea’s ownership must reconcile data-driven strategy with coaching needs
Pochettino: BlueCo’s data-first recruitment, lack of experienced players limits Chelsea’s progress.
Mauricio Pochettino has laid out a blunt assessment of the upheaval at Chelsea since BlueCo took control, arguing the new direction has altered expectations and hindered short-term results. Now in charge of the USMNT, he discussed those challenges on The Overlap and urged clearer communication between owners and football staff.
Pochettino warned that the club’s shift from a win-now model to a focus on young, high-potential signings has produced few clear successes so far and left supporters unconvinced. “They have a plan that is maybe completely different than what was used to be Chelsea in the past with [former owner Roman] Abramovich,” Pochettino acknowledged. “It’s true that it’s not easy because it’s difficult for people to understand.
“When I’m thinking about a new project, the most important [thing] is how we can translate and to show what is the plan and what we want to achieve with that and how is going to be the process to arrive where we want to arrive. Sometimes, in football, it’s difficult to explain because people don’t listen. They only listen to results.
“And then because there’s too many people making the decisions—football is not an ordinary business—sometimes people struggle. They need to explain the plan.”
Supporters have flagged the squad’s youth: Tosin Adarabioyo is the oldest current player at 28, while Marc Cucurella and Enzo Fernández are 27 and 25. Pochettino said that lack of experience constrained his work in 2023–24. “What I understood [about the plan] didn’t happen after … and maybe I was wrong,” he continued.
He reflected on the progress made under his tenure: the side rose from 12th in the Premier League to sixth, finished the season strongly, reached the Carabao Cup final and lost an FA Cup semi-final against Manchester City. “But after, when things didn’t match what was our vision, we said it’s better to split and to give the possibility to the club to do what they want to do.”
Pochettino described how recruitment decisions were often preordained. “When we signed, it was already done, all the signings,” Pochettino acknowledged. “I was involved, I said O.K. when we signed [Axel] Disasi because [Wesley] Fofana was injured in preseason, and Cole Palmer. With these two, we were involved in the decisions.
“It’s more about a philosophic idea that the coaching staff … we need to be involved. We need to be a part—an important part—of the decisions because, if not, it’s not easy.
Calling the shots at Stamford Bridge are co-owner Behdad Eghbali, co-sporting directors Paul Winstanley and Laurence Stewart and recruitment chiefs Joe Shields and Sam Jewell. Pochettino urged owners and recruitment teams to balance data and analysis with coaches’ judgement on passion, pressure handling and tactical fit.
“In the moment that we arrived, we completely supported the club in all the decisions that they already made,” he concluded. “What happened after, I don’t know. If you accept to go to Chelsea, it is more clear after us, the idea of the management of the club.
“I’m not complaining because it was also my decision to leave the club, but I think to understand the new people that arrive, the new ownership, the new football, the new coaches, the new sporting directors, the new everything, we sometimes underestimate the analog things. ]
Arsenal
FPL Gameweek 35: Priority Picks and Value Options
GW35 FPL essentials: Raya, Darlow, Bruno, Haaland and budget defenders to boost your squad this wk.
With four gameweeks left, Gameweek 35 demands careful moves. Managers still chasing mini-league gains should prioritise reliable returns and inexpensive enablers that free funds for captains in the final stretch.
Goalkeepers: David Raya (£6.0m) remains the standout option among keepers after a 10-point haul last weekend and offers value alongside Arsenal’s defence. Fulham have blanked in four of their last six league games, making a home clean sheet plausible. At the other end of the budget spectrum, Karl Darlow (£3.9m) has accrued 24 points across his last five games and faces relegated Burnley at home, serving as a low-cost enabler. For managers planning ahead to double Gameweek 36, Dean Henderson (£5.1m) is an alternative given Crystal Palace’s two fixtures next round, despite a tricky away match with Bournemouth this Sunday.
Defenders: Gabriel (£7.2m) is a must, while Nico O’Reilly (£5.1m) has become increasingly attractive for managers preparing for City’s double in the next round; he has returned 27 points from his past three fixtures and faces low-scoring Everton away on Monday. Crystal Palace options include Jaydee Canvot (£4.5m) and Chris Richards (£4.4m) as budget routes into their backline, and Daniel Muñoz (£5.8m) offers more attacking upside after scoring in the defeat at Liverpool. Leeds defensive targets such as James Justin (£3.9m), Jayden Bogle (£4.4m) and Pascal Struijk (£4.3m) are also useful given a favourable fixture.
Midfielders: Bruno Fernandes (£10.4m) stands alone as the essential midfield pick; he is chasing the Premier League assist record for a single season and has delivered returns in each of his past seven matches, even ahead of Manchester United’s home game with Liverpool. Other options highlighted are Eberechi Eze (£7.2m), who made an impact after being brought off the bench in Europe, Rayan Cherki (£6.5m) with 23 points across his last three matches, Ismaïla Sarr (£6.3m) ahead of a double, Noah Okafor (£5.6m) despite a slight injury concern, and Enzo Fernández (£6.5m) under Calum McFarlane.
Forwards: Erling Haaland (£14.5m) is essential following recent goalscoring exploits. Support options include Dominic Calvert-Lewin (£5.7m), who could benefit from Burnley’s struggles after Scott Parker’s dismissal, and Jarrod Bowen (£7.8m), who has produced 24 points across his past two home games for West Ham ahead of a trip to Brentford.
Chelsea
Chelsea’s Quandary Over Nicolas Jackson: Valuation, Finances and Suitable Buyers
Jackson’s loan and Chelsea’s finances mean the club will demand a substantial transfer fee. In 2026.
Chelsea have made clear they will not accept a low fee for Nicolas Jackson despite a loan to Bayern Munich that failed to deliver a guaranteed move. The arrangement required Jackson to start 40 games across the Bundesliga and Champions League to trigger a €65 million (£56.3 million, $76.1 million) permanent transfer. Competing for minutes in a one-striker system alongside Harry Kane was always a limiting factor and, with only a handful of matches remaining on the loan, the Senegal international has made 13 relevant starts.
Jackson’s raw numbers, when viewed by minutes played, are notable. In the Bundesliga his seven goals arrive at an average of one every 121 minutes; in the Champions League he has scored at a rate of one every 101 minutes. That output helps explain Chelsea’s stance. The Athletic reports that “up to £60 million” ($81.1 million) is what the Blues consider the 24-year-old to be worth in this market.
Supporters may ask why Jackson cannot be integrated at Stamford Bridge. Aside from an alarming on-field discipline record last season, he has 24 Premier League goals across two campaigns. The decision will rest partly with whoever is appointed manager this summer. Other squad developments could influence the case, with Liam Delap already linked with an exit after a single subpar season that could open an opportunity for Jackson.
The club also needs sales to generate reinvestment. Chelsea announced the biggest loss in Premier League history when the 2024–25 accounts were published. The club’s only prior profit relied on the sale of the women’s team to themselves, an accountancy measure not accepted by UEFA and subsequently closed by the Premier League. Although Chelsea competed in the Champions League this season, the likely absence of that revenue in 2026–27, limited matchday income and frequent absence of a front-of-shirt sponsor will sharpen the need for transfer receipts.
Finding a buyer at the valuation is the harder task. Jackson has not been a true prolific scorer and his Bayern loan illustrated the backup role he would occupy at elite clubs. If purchased as a support option, transfer fees fall. Possible suitors mentioned include Aston Villa, Newcastle United, Tottenham Hotspur, Napoli, Atlético Madrid and Galatasaray, each for reasons noted in recent coverage.
-
Analytics & Stats2 months agoOpta Supercomputer: Tight Premier League Relegation Picture After Tottenham Defeat
-
Analytics & Stats2 months agoOpta Supercomputer Lays Out 2025–26 Premier League Forecast as Arsenal Lead the Way
-
Analytics & Stats1 month agoOpta Model: Tottenham’s Survival Odds After Igor Tudor Exit
