Connect with us

Chelsea

Why the Premier League Confirmed a Yellow for Bentancur After Reece James Tackle

Premier League: VAR confirmed yellow for Bentancur after studs into Reece James’s ankle; debate via

Published

on

Tottenham Hotspur midfielder Rodrigo Bentancur was shown a yellow card after a late challenge that left Chelsea full back Reece James with studs in his ankle during a heated Premier League derby.

James was first to a loose ball but received a full set of studs into his ankle for his troubles. On-pitch referee Jarred Gillett, who was taking charge of this infamously feisty fixture for the first time, gave himself some thinking time. After an exchange of views with the VAR in Stockley Park, Gillett brandished a yellow, rather than red, card. Much to James’s evident fury, his Chelsea teammate Trevoh Chalobah was also booked for arguing with the referee.

During the half-time interval the Premier League’s official match centre explained that: “The referee’s call of yellow card to Bentancur was checked and confirmed by VAR—with the contact deemed to be a reckless challenge and not serious foul play.”

Law 12 in the FA Handbook details the subtle differences in its definition of “reckless” challenges and “serious foul play.” That distinction underpinned the match officials’ decision to leave Bentancur on the field.

Advertisement

Sky Sports pundit Jamie Carragher was quick to dismiss the incident. The former Liverpool defender, no stranger to a forceful lunge of his own back in his playing days, argued that Bentancur didn’t make contact high enough up James’s shin to warrant a red card.

The verdict did not settle opinion among supporters. Social media reaction was sharply divided, with some users questioning Bentancur’s decision-making and others angry that the tackle did not merit a sending-off:

“Sometimes I genuinely do not understand the thought process behind some of Bentancur’s actions.”

“How is Bentancur not sent off? I get its a derby, but those challanges should be red regardless imo”

Advertisement

The confirmation from VAR that the challenge was reckless rather than serious foul play resolved the formal outcome, but it ensured the incident remained a contentious talking point after the match.

Chelsea

Enzo Maresca Raised as a Serious Candidate to Replace Pep Guardiola

Manchester City are reported to consider Enzo Maresca among leading options to replace Guardiola….

Published

on

Reports suggest Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca has entered Manchester City’s succession conversation as a potential replacement for Pep Guardiola. Per The Athletic, the Chelsea boss is described as “high among the candidates” Manchester City are considering to fill the gap Guardiola will leave at the Etihad when he eventually steps down.

Guardiola lauded Maresca earlier this season, calling him “one of the best managers in the world.” That public praise has fed speculation that the current Chelsea coach could be viewed internally as a viable long-term option for City.

Despite signing an extension that runs until the summer of 2027, there is “a growing anticipation” that Guardiola could call it quits at the end of the current campaign. This season marks Guardiola’s 10th at Manchester City; he previously managed four years in Catalonia and three at Bayern Munich, doubling his longest spell at a single club.

Guardiola explained how he felt compelled to continue at City in November 2024 to help steer the club out of a dire run of form. The decline accelerated in the short term before he oversaw a third-place finish, two points above Maresca’s Chelsea, and a run to the FA Cup final. Reports add that any final decision on Guardiola’s future is likely to be delayed until the end of the campaign, consistent with the coach’s history of operating on one-year rolling contracts.

Advertisement

The timing of the story coincides with a challenging period for Maresca at Stamford Bridge. The Italian admitted to experiencing the “worst 48 hours” of his Chelsea tenure after perceived signals of a lack of faith from unnamed parties. Contact with the club’s co-sporting directors and owners has been described as limited, leaving his immediate future uncertain.

Chelsea have Maresca under contract until 2029, and that deal includes a one-year extension clause. While Maresca’s Chelsea agreement is lengthy, the reports note that appetite to continue is not guaranteed on either side as the season progresses.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Chelsea outline midfield priority with January unlikely to deliver arrivals

Chelsea expect to add midfield cover by summer 2026; January only if injuries force their hand. Plans

Published

on

Chelsea have identified central midfield as the principal area to reinforce but expect any permanent additions to arrive after the summer window. Sources suggest the plan is to recruit depth rather than a headline signing immediately, with one report saying the club are tipped to sign “at least one new midfielder in 2026”.

The immediate rationale is straightforward. First-team minutes are concentrated among a small group. Marc Cucurella is the only Chelsea player to amass more minutes this season than Fernández, with Caicedo also right up there. Injuries have compounded the issue: Dário Essugo has yet to play this season after thigh surgery in September, and Roméo Lavia has been sidelined since early November following another setback after missing the start of the campaign.

Enzo Maresca has therefore been working with limited options. Andrey Santos is the only other natural central midfielder available in the first-team squad, and full backs have been used to plug gaps; Reece James has filled in semi-regularly while Malo Gusto has done similar.

According to The Telegraph, scouting and recruitment work is under way but the idea is that no one will arrive before the summer. The January window would only be exploited if injuries pile up and force action sooner.

Advertisement

There is also a financial consideration about the profile of any target. The club may be reluctant to pay nine-figure fees for a player intended predominantly as rotation cover, particularly given the combined cost of Caicedo and Fernández, which amounts to almost £222 million ($296.5 million) in 2023. Names linked among the game’s brightest prospects have been valued at around £100 million each, a level Chelsea appear unlikely to pursue for a backup role. A more realistic spending bracket mentioned is around £20–40 million.

Candidates discussed in that price range include Atalanta’s Éderson, who has been linked with Barcelona and Manchester United, and the possibility of Conor Gallagher returning to England has also been raised. Gallagher was allowed to join Atlético Madrid in 2024 and has mostly appeared from the bench this season. On selling academy graduates under league rules, Maresca said: “The clubs are compelled to sell players because of the rules. It’s not a Chelsea problem, it is a Premier League problem,” and “The intention from Chelsea is not to sell—but the rules in the end make us. I love that [Franceso] Totti was at Roma for 20 years and a one-club man. My personal opinion is it’s a shame because we all like to see a one-club man. If we want to promote academy players—yes, change the rule.” New Squad Cost Ratio regulations will replace PSR next season.

Continue Reading

Chelsea

Maresca: No Contact With Chelsea Hierarchy Since Cryptic Remarks

Maresca says he has not been contacted by club hierarchy since his recent cryptic message. Tonight..

Published

on

Enzo Maresca confirmed that he has not had any contact with club officials since making a cryptic remark that prompted questions about his relationship with those above him at Chelsea. The manager declined to expand on the comment and made clear the supporters were not the group he had in mind, telling reporters: “I’m not annoyed with all of you.”

Many observers inferred the remarks were aimed at the club hierarchy, with speculation focusing on co-sporting directors Paul Winstanley and Laurence Stewart and co-owner Behdad Eghbali. Multiple reports cited in recent coverage have suggested Maresca has grown tired of having his methods questioned by influential figures inside the organisation.

Tuesday’s Carabao Cup quarterfinal, a 3–1 win over League One side Cardiff City, did little to change the manager’s demeanour. Following the victory, when asked if he was happy he replied simply: “No.” He was also asked whether anyone from the ownership group or the sporting directors had spoken to him since his earlier comments. “No,” he revealed.

He outlined his focus after the Everton defeat, saying: “As I said yesterday, the day after Everton, I started to prepare for Cardiff, focus on Cardiff. Now I just said, on the bus I will watch Newcastle games [to prepare for Saturday’s fixture] and I didn’t speak with one of them.” The manager’s assertion of silence from the club’s upper-management is notable given the regular involvement of those figures at matches and in the dressing room before, after and sometimes during fixtures.

Advertisement

One positive moment for Maresca on the night was the reception from travelling supporters when his name was sung late on. He acknowledged the gesture, calling it: “It was a great moment.

“I appreciate it and I am always thankful. I said many times the support has always been there, knowing that any supporters in the world are not happy when you don’t win. In some moments when we haven’t won games they have not been happy, but it is normal. Overall the fans have always been there.

“You cannot imagine how happy I am for the players because it is another semifinal for them, the fans, for everyone.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending