Arsenal
Martinelli’s stoppage-time lob rescues Arsenal as City switch to pragmatic caution
Martinelli’s stoppage-time lob rescued Arsenal as Guardiola’s side parked a deep defensive block…

Gabriel Martinelli’s stoppage-time lob secured a 1–1 draw and kept Arsenal unbeaten against Manchester City since 2023 in this fixture. The goal arrived after a second half in which City abandoned their usual attacking control and deployed a compact shape to protect their lead.
Erling Haaland opened the scoring following intelligent hold-up play. He held off an eager Gabriel before releasing Tijjani Reijnders. Haaland then burst past Gabriel into space and, when the delayed one-two from Reijnders arrived, “Haaland was never going to miss.” The sequence underlined how City’s No. 9 remains a decisive threat even if this is perhaps his most subdued scoring start to a Premier League season.
Defensively Arsenal have grown under Mikel Arteta to a level that troubles most opponents. William Saliba returned to the starting line-up after nursing an ankle injury, with Cristhian Mosquera having performed well in his absence. Haaland’s early joy came against Gabriel’s partner rather than the Frenchman, and the duel between striker and centre-back pairing remains central to the fixture’s narrative.
The biggest storyline was Guardiola’s tactical shift. Having previously said he would “never want City to play that way.” when describing counter-attacking models, the manager opted for extreme pragmatism here. City defended in a 5-4-1 for much of the second half and effectively parked a sky blue bus in front of Donnarumma’s goal after Haaland was withdrawn with 15 minutes remaining. The approach yielded a single point when Martinelli’s late combination with Eze produced the equaliser.
Arteta also drew scrutiny for his midfield selection. The manager reverted to a cautious trio that included Mikel Merino on the right to cover Martin Ødegaard’s absence. That choice blunted Arsenal’s typically fluid control in the first half, leaving supporters waiting for set-pieces or for Noni Madueke to create a decisive moment. Ultimately, the substitutes and late attacking spark gave Arsenal a deserved rescue and produced three clear takeaways from a strangely conservative encounter.
Arsenal
Martinelli backs Gyökeres to hit 30-40 goals with Ødegaard supplying the creativity
Martinelli says Gyökeres could score 30 or 40 goals as Ødegaard’s creativity creates clear openings

Gabriel Martinelli has publicly backed Viktor Gyökeres to reach the high double figures this season, suggesting the Swedish striker could finish with “30 or 40 goals a season.” Martinelli pointed to the influence of Martin Ødegaard as a decisive factor in that projection after Arsenal’s Champions League victory over Olympiacos.
The towering 27-year-old has proved a handful for central defenders even when not scoring, something that was underscored by his performance in Arsenal‘s 2–0 win over Olympiacos in the Champions League on Wednesday. Gyökeres outmuscled both Olympiacos centre backs in the build-up to Martinelli’s opener, finishing the game with three shots, 0.47 expected goals and seven touches in the opposition penalty area.
Bukayo Saka was also on the scoresheet midweek but it was Ødegaard who was the standout performer, with Martinelli believing the Norwegian will boost Gyökeres’ goalscoring numbers in his debut term. The forward’s physical presence and movement were highlighted as complementary to Ødegaard’s ability to find team-mates in dangerous positions.
“We are really happy with [Gyökeres], we trust him, we know his qualities and he’s one of the top strikers in the world right now,” said Martinelli after the victory.
“We trust him and we are trying to give him the confidence to score and to do his best on the pitch to help us. It’s really good to play with Martin there because he’s always trying to find you, when we make the movement.
“And for Viktor as well, his qualities as well, as he likes to go in behind and attack the opposition’s box. I think him playing with Martin as well is going to be good for him. We are going to try to give him the ball as much as possible to make him score, I don’t know, 30 or 40 goals a season.”
Martinelli’s assessment rests on Gyökeres converting chances that are created by Ødegaard and others, and on the striker maintaining the form shown against Olympiacos.
Arsenal
Arteta confident Gabriel will recover after precautionary withdrawal vs Olympiacos
Arteta: Gabriel expected to recover after being withdrawn vs Olympiacos; West Ham fitness watch plan

Mikel Arteta sought to calm concern over Gabriel Magalhães after the centre back was withdrawn during Arsenal’s victory over Olympiacos. The manager described the substitution as a precaution and indicated the issue is not expected to be serious.
“I think he’s going to be OK,” Arteta explained.
Arteta said the problem stemmed from a first-half challenge. “I think it was a kick, in the first half, and it was a bit uncomfortable. He could carry on but we decided not to take any risks because he’s played a lot of games. He’s coming back from a long-term injury and we need to look after him.” Those comments underline a cautious approach given Gabriel’s recent long-term layoff and his heavy workload since returning.
Despite the reassurance, Arsenal face a short wait to confirm whether Gabriel will be available for Saturday’s Premier League meeting with West Ham United. The Brazilian has played every minute of league action so far this season, following a hamstring injury that ended his 2024–25 campaign in April, so any enforced absence would halt that run.
Arsenal’s defensive options provide cover. Cristhian Mosquera replaced Gabriel alongside William Saliba when the change was made, and Riccardo Calafiori can also operate centrally despite being used primarily on the left in England. Piero Hincapié remains out with a groin issue; while his setback is not expected to be lengthy, the Ecuador international will not be fit for Saturday’s game.
Arteta’s handling of Gabriel’s withdrawal reflects a priority on long-term fitness over short-term gain. With rotation and alternatives available, Arsenal will monitor the centre back closely ahead of their domestic fixture, balancing the desire to maintain an unbeaten run of appearances for Gabriel against the need to manage his recovery following a significant prior injury.
Arsenal
Webb: VAR Was Right to Overturn Arsenal’s Penalty Appeal
Webb rejects Arteta’s call after VAR showed Pope brushed the ball, explaining why no foul was given.

Howard Webb has publicly disagreed with Mikel Arteta’s criticism of a non-penalty decision after Arsenal’s late 2–1 victory over Newcastle United. The incident occurred when Gyökeres rounded Newcastle United’s goalkeeper Nick Pope midway through the first half. Arsenal argued for a penalty after contact was made, but Webb says the VAR intervention showed the full sequence.
“There was an important part around this in that the referee didn’t recognise that touch by Pope in real time,” Webb explained on Match Officials Mic’d Up .
Webb outlined the process that led the VAR to recommend a review and why the referee then went to the pitchside monitor.
“Hence the reason that when the VAR saw it, he deemed it to be a clear and obvious error because that touch by Pope hadn’t been seen, and therefore the referee could go to the screen to look at that really important aspect and make a judgement for himself, and the judgement was: I’ve seen the touch, therefore it’s not a foul, and I’m going to start with the drop ball.”
Supporters of Arsenal pointed to the sending off of Robert Sánchez for Chelsea against Manchester United earlier this season, where Sánchez also made contact with the ball before connecting with a forward, Bryan Mbeumo. Webb rejected the comparison and described key differences between the two incidents.
“Pope then plants his foot on the ground. He doesn’t drive it forward into Gyökeres,” Webb said. “There’s a gap, clearly a gap, between the two players after Pope has played the ball, and then the two players come together quite normally. The action by Pope is normal. It’s not reckless. It’s just a kick out towards the ball. The ball deviates.
“No contact on the player until the ball has been played away, and then the contact happens fairly normally. So, not a foul, and therefore a good use of the VAR to intervene to show the referee what really happened.”
Webb’s explanation concentrates on the sequence of touch, the referee’s initial lack of sight, and how VAR restored the correct on-field decision.