Connect with us

Arsenal

Viktor Gyokeres Reflects on Choosing Arsenal Over Manchester United

Viktor Gyökeres explains why Arsenal’s desire made his choice clear despite Man Utd interest.

Published

on

Viktor Gyökeres, Arsenal’s new striker, has shared insights into his decision to join the club despite interest from Manchester United. The Sweden international highlighted Arsenal’s clear desire for his signature as a key factor in his choice.

While discussions with Arsenal progressed, Manchester United also approached Sporting for a potential reunion with manager Ruben Amorim. However, Gyökeres’s commitment to joining the Emirates Stadium side remained firm. He told The Athletic, “I felt that they wanted me here. But also because it’s a very big club with a lot of history. I just felt that I really wanted to come here and be a part of this club.”

He acknowledged that other clubs were in the running, but did not find the decision difficult. Gyökeres arrives with a significant reputation, having scored 97 goals in 102 appearances for Sporting. This pressure increased when he was assigned the iconic No.14 shirt at Arsenal, a number famously worn by Thierry Henry, with shirt sales reportedly reaching record levels.

On wearing the storied No.14 shirt, Gyökeres said, “Of course I know about the history [of the shirt], but to be honest, there weren’t too many numbers to pick from. But of course, that one was available, so when I knew that it was an easy choice to take it.”

Advertisement

He was keen to set realistic expectations, stating, “It’s not really my intention to be compared with what [Henry]’s achieved in his career, especially here. I just want to do my own thing and show my qualities. Of course, he was an amazing player, but different from me. I think I have enough expectations on myself. I’ll just try to perform, to be honest. It’s not really up to me how people think or expect.”

Arsenal

Martinelli backs Gyökeres to hit 30-40 goals with Ødegaard supplying the creativity

Martinelli says Gyökeres could score 30 or 40 goals as Ødegaard’s creativity creates clear openings

Published

on

Gabriel Martinelli has publicly backed Viktor Gyökeres to reach the high double figures this season, suggesting the Swedish striker could finish with “30 or 40 goals a season.” Martinelli pointed to the influence of Martin Ødegaard as a decisive factor in that projection after Arsenal’s Champions League victory over Olympiacos.

The towering 27-year-old has proved a handful for central defenders even when not scoring, something that was underscored by his performance in Arsenal‘s 2–0 win over Olympiacos in the Champions League on Wednesday. Gyökeres outmuscled both Olympiacos centre backs in the build-up to Martinelli’s opener, finishing the game with three shots, 0.47 expected goals and seven touches in the opposition penalty area.

Bukayo Saka was also on the scoresheet midweek but it was Ødegaard who was the standout performer, with Martinelli believing the Norwegian will boost Gyökeres’ goalscoring numbers in his debut term. The forward’s physical presence and movement were highlighted as complementary to Ødegaard’s ability to find team-mates in dangerous positions.

“We are really happy with [Gyökeres], we trust him, we know his qualities and he’s one of the top strikers in the world right now,” said Martinelli after the victory.

Advertisement

“We trust him and we are trying to give him the confidence to score and to do his best on the pitch to help us. It’s really good to play with Martin there because he’s always trying to find you, when we make the movement.

“And for Viktor as well, his qualities as well, as he likes to go in behind and attack the opposition’s box. I think him playing with Martin as well is going to be good for him. We are going to try to give him the ball as much as possible to make him score, I don’t know, 30 or 40 goals a season.”

Martinelli’s assessment rests on Gyökeres converting chances that are created by Ødegaard and others, and on the striker maintaining the form shown against Olympiacos.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arsenal

Arteta confident Gabriel will recover after precautionary withdrawal vs Olympiacos

Arteta: Gabriel expected to recover after being withdrawn vs Olympiacos; West Ham fitness watch plan

Published

on

Mikel Arteta sought to calm concern over Gabriel Magalhães after the centre back was withdrawn during Arsenal’s victory over Olympiacos. The manager described the substitution as a precaution and indicated the issue is not expected to be serious.

“I think he’s going to be OK,” Arteta explained.

Arteta said the problem stemmed from a first-half challenge. “I think it was a kick, in the first half, and it was a bit uncomfortable. He could carry on but we decided not to take any risks because he’s played a lot of games. He’s coming back from a long-term injury and we need to look after him.” Those comments underline a cautious approach given Gabriel’s recent long-term layoff and his heavy workload since returning.

Despite the reassurance, Arsenal face a short wait to confirm whether Gabriel will be available for Saturday’s Premier League meeting with West Ham United. The Brazilian has played every minute of league action so far this season, following a hamstring injury that ended his 2024–25 campaign in April, so any enforced absence would halt that run.

Advertisement

Arsenal’s defensive options provide cover. Cristhian Mosquera replaced Gabriel alongside William Saliba when the change was made, and Riccardo Calafiori can also operate centrally despite being used primarily on the left in England. Piero Hincapié remains out with a groin issue; while his setback is not expected to be lengthy, the Ecuador international will not be fit for Saturday’s game.

Arteta’s handling of Gabriel’s withdrawal reflects a priority on long-term fitness over short-term gain. With rotation and alternatives available, Arsenal will monitor the centre back closely ahead of their domestic fixture, balancing the desire to maintain an unbeaten run of appearances for Gabriel against the need to manage his recovery following a significant prior injury.

Continue Reading

Arsenal

Webb: VAR Was Right to Overturn Arsenal’s Penalty Appeal

Webb rejects Arteta’s call after VAR showed Pope brushed the ball, explaining why no foul was given.

Published

on

Howard Webb has publicly disagreed with Mikel Arteta’s criticism of a non-penalty decision after Arsenal’s late 2–1 victory over Newcastle United. The incident occurred when Gyökeres rounded Newcastle United’s goalkeeper Nick Pope midway through the first half. Arsenal argued for a penalty after contact was made, but Webb says the VAR intervention showed the full sequence.

“There was an important part around this in that the referee didn’t recognise that touch by Pope in real time,” Webb explained on Match Officials Mic’d Up .

Webb outlined the process that led the VAR to recommend a review and why the referee then went to the pitchside monitor.

“Hence the reason that when the VAR saw it, he deemed it to be a clear and obvious error because that touch by Pope hadn’t been seen, and therefore the referee could go to the screen to look at that really important aspect and make a judgement for himself, and the judgement was: I’ve seen the touch, therefore it’s not a foul, and I’m going to start with the drop ball.”

Advertisement

Supporters of Arsenal pointed to the sending off of Robert Sánchez for Chelsea against Manchester United earlier this season, where Sánchez also made contact with the ball before connecting with a forward, Bryan Mbeumo. Webb rejected the comparison and described key differences between the two incidents.

“Pope then plants his foot on the ground. He doesn’t drive it forward into Gyökeres,” Webb said. “There’s a gap, clearly a gap, between the two players after Pope has played the ball, and then the two players come together quite normally. The action by Pope is normal. It’s not reckless. It’s just a kick out towards the ball. The ball deviates.

“No contact on the player until the ball has been played away, and then the contact happens fairly normally. So, not a foul, and therefore a good use of the VAR to intervene to show the referee what really happened.”

Webb’s explanation concentrates on the sequence of touch, the referee’s initial lack of sight, and how VAR restored the correct on-field decision.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending