Chelsea
Chelsea capitalise on West Ham’s defensive breakdown in emphatic 5-1 victory
Joao Pedro dominated as Chelsea routed West Ham 5-1; West Ham’s defending and organisation collapsed
Chelsea punished an alarmingly disjointed West Ham side to record a 5-1 victory that left more questions than answers for Graham Potter. From the first whistle the gap in organisation was obvious: basic defending repeatedly failed, and by the 33rd minute the “match” was essentially over as any kind of contest. That was the moment of Enzo Fernandez’s easy third and when many fans began to leave.
West Ham were poor across the board. Set-pieces were exploited with three goals coming from dead-ball situations. Aerial vulnerability was exposed when Joao Pedro’s first arrived with a header and other goals flowed from corner deliveries. On the ground, simple passing often broke down, most clearly in the sequence that led to Pedro Neto’s goal when three West Ham players lost possession.
There were frequent instances of players being muscled off the ball and several clear chances conceded from yards out. It was hard not to feel sympathy for Mads Hermansen, who finally saved an Estevao effort in the 72nd minute only to be met with ironic cheers earlier.
Tactically Potter’s approach did not suit this group. Midfield was slow and Chelsea dominated the area, while Niclas Fullkrug was effectively isolated in attack. An additional centre-half created confusion in positioning rather than stability, and simple errors were punished repeatedly.
Chelsea, for their part, showed several promising signs. Joao Pedro was influential, scoring and creating opportunities, and Neto caused persistent problems for the hosts. Estevao Willian produced the pass for Fernandez’s strike. Five different players scored for Chelsea, and Moises Caicedo and Trevoh Chalobah gained confidence from their rare goals.
There is growing debate over Potter’s future and whether he fits the club. Some point to the manager’s emphasis on a “Performance” culture clashing with the current structure, which does not resemble the progressive model in which such an approach has previously thrived. For now the result is clear: Chelsea underlined their attacking potential while West Ham must urgently fix the defensive disorder that made this defeat so comprehensive.
Chelsea
Ngumoha explains why Liverpool move was an easy call after Chelsea exit
Ngumoha says Liverpool offered him a clearer route to first-team football than Chelsea ever could.
Rio Ngumoha has described his switch from Chelsea to Liverpool as an obvious decision, saying the promise of a clearer route to first-team football made the move straightforward.
Chelsea were frustrated to lose a highly rated youngster, with Liverpool eventually paying a minimum of $3.7 million after a tribunal. But for Ngumoha, the attraction of a defined pathway at Anfield outweighed everything else.
“I feel like I needed a new challenge,” Ngumoha told The Guardian. “Liverpool gave me a new pathway. The plan that they set for me was straightforward. It was a no-brainer. They just said if I prove myself then they know that I would definitely be a star for them in the making.”
The 18-year-old has already begun to justify that faith. After making his debut in the 2024-25 season, he went on to feature 29 times the following campaign, a year highlighted by a late winner against Newcastle United in the Premier League.
Arne Slot provided the platform for his breakthrough, and Ngumoha is now benefiting from fresh leadership. Andoni Iraola has given him regular starts and useful minutes from the bench, with the forward generally impressing and adding two assists.
Ngumoha also sees the Ballon d’Or as a realistic target in the future, helped by the wider impact of Harry Kane’s success. “Harry Kane winning the Ballon d’Or is definitely a big thing,” said the teenager. “It’s also helped English football now because everyone’s seen one of us win the Ballon d’Or , it is definitely encouraging many more people to want to be known as the best player in the world.
“For me, I would like to achieve it and I think I can do it.”
He will have the chance to discuss that ambition with Kane during the current international break, after being named once more in Thomas Tuchel’s England squad.
Ngumoha’s departure also reflects a familiar pattern. Chelsea’s habit of collecting elite young talent has often led to players seeking opportunities elsewhere, and he joins the likes of Marc Guéhi, Lewis Hall, Tino Livramento and Michael Olise in leaving Stamford Bridge in search of a clearer route to senior soccer.
Even so, Chelsea’s approach has not changed. Last summer they spent $167 million on four players aged 22 or under, yet minutes have remained hard to find. Dastan Satpayev has already gone on loan, while Geovany Quenda, Marco Palestra and Valentín Barco have managed only four Premier League starts between them.
Borussia Dortmund
Five Possible Moves for Estêvão, Ranked
Estêvão is short of minutes at Chelsea, and several major clubs could enter the picture.
Estêvão’s place in Xabi Alonso’s plans appears secure in theory, but the evidence on the pitch has told a different story. The Brazilian youngster has found minutes hard to come by in a system built around a back three and wingbacks, which has left little space for wide forwards. He was even left on the bench when Chelsea exited the Carabao Cup on penalties to Liverpool last month.
There was a reminder of what he can offer when Alonso shifted to a 4-2-3-1 for the recent win over Manchester United. Estêvão started on the right and produced a strong display. Yet that momentum did not last, with another formation change ahead of the defeat to Sunderland before the international break sending him back to the bench.
BBC Sport reported in September that Estêvão was among a small group of “untouchable” Chelsea players, alongside Moisés Caicedo, Cole Palmer and João Pedro. Even so, a player of his ability, and one who has long attracted attention, could eventually begin to look elsewhere if the current situation does not improve.
If that point arrives, several destinations could enter the picture.
Paris Saint-Germain remain a logical name in any discussion of elite attacking talent, particularly after their summer reshuffle. But with Lee Kang-in, Bradley Barcola and Gonçalo Ramos already moved on, and with Maghnes Akliouche, Ferran Torres and Mika Godts arriving, they are more likely to trust their current options. They have also been hit by Khvicha Kvaratskhelia’s ACL tear, though Luis Enrique still has plenty to work with.
Liverpool is another obvious possibility. After Mohamed Salah’s departure in the summer, Andoni Iraola has used Bradley Barcola, Cody Gakpo and Rio Ngumoha on the right wing, but that position may still need greater certainty. A Chelsea sale to a Premier League rival would be difficult to imagine, yet the financial logic is there.
Borussia Dortmund, meanwhile, would make sense only if the situation worsened and Chelsea agreed to a loan in January. They may not be as imposing as they once were, but the club still has a reputation for developing talent. Estêvão may not be the ideal Niko Kovać wide player, but Dortmund would be one to watch if temporary respite becomes the next step.
Chelsea
Chelsea’s penalty appeal at Sunderland explained by VAR check
Chelsea’s penalty appeal was rejected at Sunderland after VAR judged the challenge outside the box.
Chelsea’s first-half visit to Sunderland produced a major refereeing flashpoint after a penalty appeal was turned down and then left untouched by VAR.
The key moment arrived about a quarter of the way through the opening half, when Palmer shifted beyond Luke O’Nien. Sunderland’s skipper tried to stop him, but he did not get near the ball and instead came into the back of Palmer’s right knee.
Referee Gillett did not signal for a foul, and video assistant referee Nick Hopton also chose not to ask for a review at the monitor. During the contest, the Premier League issued a statement saying the VAR was not convinced by the penalty appeal.
Hopton’s view was that the incident happened outside the area. Broadcast footage, however, suggested the contact may have started just before the white line and then continued into the box, which would have made a penalty decision more likely.
The reasoning behind the call sits in the way VAR is allowed to operate. It can only intervene when there is a “clear and obvious error,” a standard maintained by the Premier League’s lawmakers.
That still left many online fans angry at the outcome, especially after Sunderland were awarded a penalty just 13 minutes later. Sky Sports commentator Chris Sutton offered only partial sympathy for the visitors, adding to the scrutiny on a decision that had already become the main talking point of the match.
