Arsenal
Arsenal Face Selection Crisis Before Champions League Opener
Ben White joins four other absentees as Arsenal approach Champions League opener short-handed.

Arsenal will begin their Champions League campaign with a depleted squad after Ben White was added to the list of absentees ahead of Tuesday’s opener against Athletic Club. Mikel Arteta confirmed that Martin Ødegaard and Bukayo Saka, who both missed Monday’s training session, would not feature either.
Long-term absentees Kai Havertz and Gabriel Jesus increase the number of unavailable first-team players to five. Ødegaard suffered a reoccurrence of a shoulder issue against Forest but will not have to undergo surgery. Saka also avoided the knife following damage to his hamstring last month.
Speaking in his pre-match press conference on Monday, Arteta revealed: “I think there are still quite a lot of things to go through [for Saka]. It’s very early to understand when and which week he’s going to be available. But he will certainly be pushing to be available as quickly as possible.”
There was a sliver of good news as William Saliba and Christian Nørgaard are back in contention after their own fitness issues. Their potential availability will provide Arteta with options as he navigates a reduced squad for the European opener.
Arsenal’s summer recruitment has already been tested by the early injury problems. Viktor Gyökeres and Martín Zubimendi were naturally expected to be swiftly thrust into the starting XI, but those plans have been altered and injuries have instead provided an early flood of minutes for Noni Madueke and Cristhian Mosquera.
The timing of the absences, with several senior players missing on the eve of a major fixture, will force Arteta to adjust his selection and game plan for Tuesday’s match. How quickly the sidelined players return remains uncertain, with some avoiding surgery but still requiring time to recover.
Arsenal
Martinelli backs Gyökeres to hit 30-40 goals with Ødegaard supplying the creativity
Martinelli says Gyökeres could score 30 or 40 goals as Ødegaard’s creativity creates clear openings

Gabriel Martinelli has publicly backed Viktor Gyökeres to reach the high double figures this season, suggesting the Swedish striker could finish with “30 or 40 goals a season.” Martinelli pointed to the influence of Martin Ødegaard as a decisive factor in that projection after Arsenal’s Champions League victory over Olympiacos.
The towering 27-year-old has proved a handful for central defenders even when not scoring, something that was underscored by his performance in Arsenal‘s 2–0 win over Olympiacos in the Champions League on Wednesday. Gyökeres outmuscled both Olympiacos centre backs in the build-up to Martinelli’s opener, finishing the game with three shots, 0.47 expected goals and seven touches in the opposition penalty area.
Bukayo Saka was also on the scoresheet midweek but it was Ødegaard who was the standout performer, with Martinelli believing the Norwegian will boost Gyökeres’ goalscoring numbers in his debut term. The forward’s physical presence and movement were highlighted as complementary to Ødegaard’s ability to find team-mates in dangerous positions.
“We are really happy with [Gyökeres], we trust him, we know his qualities and he’s one of the top strikers in the world right now,” said Martinelli after the victory.
“We trust him and we are trying to give him the confidence to score and to do his best on the pitch to help us. It’s really good to play with Martin there because he’s always trying to find you, when we make the movement.
“And for Viktor as well, his qualities as well, as he likes to go in behind and attack the opposition’s box. I think him playing with Martin as well is going to be good for him. We are going to try to give him the ball as much as possible to make him score, I don’t know, 30 or 40 goals a season.”
Martinelli’s assessment rests on Gyökeres converting chances that are created by Ødegaard and others, and on the striker maintaining the form shown against Olympiacos.
Arsenal
Arteta confident Gabriel will recover after precautionary withdrawal vs Olympiacos
Arteta: Gabriel expected to recover after being withdrawn vs Olympiacos; West Ham fitness watch plan

Mikel Arteta sought to calm concern over Gabriel Magalhães after the centre back was withdrawn during Arsenal’s victory over Olympiacos. The manager described the substitution as a precaution and indicated the issue is not expected to be serious.
“I think he’s going to be OK,” Arteta explained.
Arteta said the problem stemmed from a first-half challenge. “I think it was a kick, in the first half, and it was a bit uncomfortable. He could carry on but we decided not to take any risks because he’s played a lot of games. He’s coming back from a long-term injury and we need to look after him.” Those comments underline a cautious approach given Gabriel’s recent long-term layoff and his heavy workload since returning.
Despite the reassurance, Arsenal face a short wait to confirm whether Gabriel will be available for Saturday’s Premier League meeting with West Ham United. The Brazilian has played every minute of league action so far this season, following a hamstring injury that ended his 2024–25 campaign in April, so any enforced absence would halt that run.
Arsenal’s defensive options provide cover. Cristhian Mosquera replaced Gabriel alongside William Saliba when the change was made, and Riccardo Calafiori can also operate centrally despite being used primarily on the left in England. Piero Hincapié remains out with a groin issue; while his setback is not expected to be lengthy, the Ecuador international will not be fit for Saturday’s game.
Arteta’s handling of Gabriel’s withdrawal reflects a priority on long-term fitness over short-term gain. With rotation and alternatives available, Arsenal will monitor the centre back closely ahead of their domestic fixture, balancing the desire to maintain an unbeaten run of appearances for Gabriel against the need to manage his recovery following a significant prior injury.
Arsenal
Webb: VAR Was Right to Overturn Arsenal’s Penalty Appeal
Webb rejects Arteta’s call after VAR showed Pope brushed the ball, explaining why no foul was given.

Howard Webb has publicly disagreed with Mikel Arteta’s criticism of a non-penalty decision after Arsenal’s late 2–1 victory over Newcastle United. The incident occurred when Gyökeres rounded Newcastle United’s goalkeeper Nick Pope midway through the first half. Arsenal argued for a penalty after contact was made, but Webb says the VAR intervention showed the full sequence.
“There was an important part around this in that the referee didn’t recognise that touch by Pope in real time,” Webb explained on Match Officials Mic’d Up .
Webb outlined the process that led the VAR to recommend a review and why the referee then went to the pitchside monitor.
“Hence the reason that when the VAR saw it, he deemed it to be a clear and obvious error because that touch by Pope hadn’t been seen, and therefore the referee could go to the screen to look at that really important aspect and make a judgement for himself, and the judgement was: I’ve seen the touch, therefore it’s not a foul, and I’m going to start with the drop ball.”
Supporters of Arsenal pointed to the sending off of Robert Sánchez for Chelsea against Manchester United earlier this season, where Sánchez also made contact with the ball before connecting with a forward, Bryan Mbeumo. Webb rejected the comparison and described key differences between the two incidents.
“Pope then plants his foot on the ground. He doesn’t drive it forward into Gyökeres,” Webb said. “There’s a gap, clearly a gap, between the two players after Pope has played the ball, and then the two players come together quite normally. The action by Pope is normal. It’s not reckless. It’s just a kick out towards the ball. The ball deviates.
“No contact on the player until the ball has been played away, and then the contact happens fairly normally. So, not a foul, and therefore a good use of the VAR to intervene to show the referee what really happened.”
Webb’s explanation concentrates on the sequence of touch, the referee’s initial lack of sight, and how VAR restored the correct on-field decision.