{"id":19726,"date":"2026-09-18T13:20:48","date_gmt":"2026-09-18T11:20:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/2026\/09\/18\/fpl-gw5-king-or-calafiori-for-your-starting-xi\/"},"modified":"2026-09-18T13:20:48","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T11:20:48","slug":"fpl-gw5-king-or-calafiori-for-your-starting-xi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/2026\/09\/18\/fpl-gw5-king-or-calafiori-for-your-starting-xi\/","title":{"rendered":"FPL GW5: King or Calafiori for your starting XI?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Josh King gets our narrow nod over Riccardo Calafiori for GW5 if you own both, expect both to start and can keep a legal formation. King hosts Manchester United; Calafiori travels to Brighton. You can make a case for either, so check the rest of your XI before choosing your first substitute.<\/p>\n<p>King has the higher early attacking involvement rate. Calafiori offers attacking returns alongside Arsenal\u2019s clean-sheet potential. The gap is small enough that fresh minutes news should carry more weight than a firm verdict based on four matches.<\/p>\n<h2>King offers the attacking edge<\/h2>\n<p>King has started four matches and played 346 minutes. His season-to-date expected goal involvement rate is 0.41 per 90: 0.30 xG\/90 and 0.11 xA\/90. At \u00a35.5m, the Fulham midfielder has contributed through shooting as well as chance creation.<\/p>\n<p>For an existing owner choosing one starter, we favour that attacking involvement at home to Manchester United. Treat it as a preference under uncertainty. Those rates describe the chances King has had and created so far; they do not predict a return this weekend.<\/p>\n<p>You also need to separate selection from recruitment. You can start King from your bench without spending a transfer or committing to a longer holding period. This comparison gives you no reason to manufacture a new purchase.<\/p>\n<h2>Calafiori keeps the decision close<\/h2>\n<p>Calafiori has started four matches and played 326 minutes. The \u00a35.8m Arsenal defender has recorded 0.33 xGI\/90, split between 0.17 xG\/90 and 0.16 xA\/90. His attacking involvement sits close enough to King\u2019s that benching him carries a clear risk.<\/p>\n<p>His defensive measure is 0.68 expected goals conceded per 90 over those same 326 minutes. That describes the quality of chances conceded during his minutes so far, rather than a clean-sheet probability for Brighton away. Still, you should account for both his clean-sheet route and his involvement going forward when comparing him with a midfielder.<\/p>\n<p>Choose Calafiori if the latest team news gives him the clearer route to a full appearance, or if your formation requires another defender. King\u2019s small attacking-rate advantage does not justify ignoring either condition.<\/p>\n<h2>Check the formation before moving the bench<\/h2>\n<p>King is an FPL midfielder and Calafiori is a defender. You need at least three defenders in your starting XI. Replacing Calafiori with King works only if the remaining lineup still meets the formation rules.<\/p>\n<p>You can <a href=\"https:\/\/weplayfpl.com\">test the two lineups in We Play FPL<\/a> and compare the players\u2019 performance data before settling on your bench order. Start with the squad you own, then check whether you are choosing between these two or overlooking a weaker starter elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>Both players currently have available status. Recheck fitness and expected starts before the GW5 deadline on Friday 18 September at 17:30 UTC. With no adverse news and a legal XI, our preference stays with King. Keep Calafiori as a strong alternative rather than treating this close call as a reason to change your transfer plan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Our narrow GW5 preference is King, but Calafiori\u2019s attacking involvement and clean-sheet route keep the choice close. Check minutes and formation before benching either.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19725,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1976,1978,173,1977],"tags":[1985],"class_list":["post-19726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-chip-strategy","category-fixtures","category-fpl","category-player-analysis","tag-gameweek-5"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19726"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19726\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weplayfpl.com\/news-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}